On Wednesday, Justice Department special counsel Jack Smith’s briefing laying out the reasoning behind continuing the election subversion case against former President Donald Trump was partially unsealed, revealing evidence that, no matter the outcome of the 2020 election, Trump intended to remain in office, even if it was through illegal means.
Smith’s filing was necessary after the U.S. Supreme Court gave Trump and all former presidents unprecedented immunity against prosecution for actions they performed as president, a ruling they issued this past summer. According to Smith, Trump’s illegal acts were performed as a candidate for office, not as president, justifying the need to continue the case against him.
Included within the brief are comments from Trump, heard by several witnesses, indicating that he was going to dispute the election results if he lost, and that he had planned a declaration of victory well before Election Day.
Speaking to his family, Trump told them that losing the election wouldn’t make a difference. “It doesn’t matter if you won or lost the election. You still have to fight like hell,” Trump said, according to an unnamed witness cited in Smith’s brief who overheard the conversation.
The witness, who is willing to testify, said the remarks were made in a private capacity, and not in the presence of any White House advisers.
The witness heard “an unprompted comment that the defendant made to his family members in which the defendant suggested that he would fight to remain in power regardless of whether he had won the election,” the filing from Smith said.
Another witness noted that Trump was “going to declare victory” no matter what the election results were, and had made the plan to do so well before Election Day.
“He’s going to declare victory. That doesn’t mean he’s the winner, he’s just going to say he’s the winner,” that witness said, per the filing.
Trump overstepped his executive authority to “perpetuate himself in power, contrary to the will of the people,” the special counsel asserted.
It appears that Trump is once again preparing to dispute the legitimacy of the election if he loses, as he has repeatedly (and baselessly) suggested that undocumented immigrants will illegally cast ballots against him in this year’s presidential race.
Every state in the country has mechanisms in place to ensure that votes are cast only by citizens. Still, Trump laid the groundwork for contesting the election results in the September presidential debate against Democratic nominee Kamala Harris.
Democrats and the Harris campaign are “trying to get [immigrants] to vote, and that’s why they’re allowing them into our country,” Trump claimed, without evidence.
When Trump preemptively contested the election results in 2020, he focused on disputing the legitimacy of mail-in voting. This year, however, Trump’s strategy centers around attacking and scapegoating immigrants, and he has been encouraging his supporters to use mail-in ballots if they desire to do so.
Trump and his allies “are pre-deploying a big lie to justify their future efforts to disrupt or overturn elections,” Wendy Weiser, a lawyer with the Brennan Center for Justice, told HuffPost regarding Trump’s strategy.
We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.
As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.
Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.
As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.
At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.
Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.
You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.