Support justice-driven, accurate and transparent news — make a quick donation to Truthout today!
In a recent interview, Republican vice presidential nominee J.D. Vance suggested that multi-billionaire Elon Musk would consider making cuts to Social Security if Donald Trump is elected president this fall.
Earlier in September, Trump pledged to create a “government efficiency commission” tasked with making cuts to federal spending. He also said that he had discussed the idea with Musk, who told Trump he would lead the commission. Musk confirmed the conversation on X, formerly known as Twitter, saying that he’d happily lead such a commission in a Trump administration.
In a podcast interview last week, Vance said that he, too, has had conversations about the idea with Musk.
“I’ve spoken with Elon a little bit about [the task force],” Vance said in the interview.
Although the task force would theoretically look at all federal spending, Vance specifically cited two agencies that would be under Musk’s purview if such a scenario were to play out.
Vance said that the “complicated” part of the commission’s work would be developing a strategy to examine each agency’s spending. “It’s going to look much different in, say, the Department of Defense versus Social Security,” Vance said.
As reported by The New Republic, Vance’s comments indicate that no government agency — including programs like Social Security — would be off-limits to Musk’s “efficiency” commission.
The publication’s report also noted that Musk’s decision-making when it comes to his own businesses hasn’t exactly been sound — when the billionaire purchased Twitter, for example, he fired around 80 percent of the staff on what was basically a whim in the name of trimming spending, a move that contributed to the rise in far right extremist accounts and vitriol on the site that has persisted ever since.
That Musk could potentially have a decision-making role in a future Trump administration is troubling, as he has shared numerous false conspiracy theories on his account (including the baseless “Pizzagate” theory). He has also promoted accounts and posts pushing far right and antisemitic viewpoints, including some that deny historical events like the Holocaust.
More recently, Musk issued a post questioning why President Joe Biden and Vice President Kamala Harris haven’t yet been targets of assassination attempts during the presidential campaign. After his post was met with widespread criticism, Musk deleted it and claimed it was a “joke,” despite stating in replies to the post that he was asking a serious question.
Important Message: Please Read
For 25 years, Truthout has survived by publishing impactful investigative journalism and analysis; distributing full editions 365 days a year; and building a community of readers who support us with small, hard-earned donations.
Eighty percent of our $3 million yearly budget comes from small donors alone. Of those, 8,000 readers support us with monthly donations. Back in 2018, when Facebook decided to suppress the circulation of posts made by organizations, thereby cutting readers off from seeing many articles shared by the news organizations they had intentionally decided to follow, Truthout’s total traffic declined by 40 percent, as nearly all of our traffic from that platform disappeared.
Now, Google has recently rolled out its AI search bar, providing AI summaries instead of directing readers to our site. Google Search is our single largest source of traffic; it’s the route by which nearly one third of our readers find us. Much like in 2018, a shocking 40 percent of our Google traffic has disappeared overnight.
It will not be easy for Truthout to shoulder this blow. Nor will it be easy for our peers and collaborators — news sites that depend on traffic and aren’t bankrolled by large corporations.
If you can support Truthout with a donation today, you can help us resist the AI onslaught. Please give today.