One of the single deadliest airstrikes carried out by Israeli forces in Gaza since the beginning of Israel’s genocidal siege seemingly had no military target and was an “apparent war crime,” Human Rights Watch has found in a new probe of the strike that killed at least 106 Palestinians.
On October 31 at around 2:30 pm, in a residential area just south of Nuseirat refugee camp in central Gaza, Israeli forces released a series of four munitions on a building known as the Engineers’ Tower, the humanitarian group found in its report. The bombs, which all struck within 10 seconds of each other, totally destroyed the six-story building, which was housing at least 350 people, with many families sheltering together.
The total number of Palestinians killed in the attack remains unknown. Human Rights Watch identified 106 individuals killed, while London-based civilian harm watchdog Airwars identified 112 people; together, the combined lists contain 136 individuals. These lists are likely an undercount, as many bodies are still buried under the rubble.
This is an extremely high civilian casualty count in any circumstance, as Human Rights Watch found; even further, the report uncovered no evidence of a military target in or around the area. Residents interviewed said they were given no advance warning of the attack or notice to evacuate.
The group has called for foreign governments to stop sending military assistance to Israel as long as it continues its attacks on civilians in Gaza.
“The absence of a military objective would render the attack on the Engineers’ Building unlawfully deliberate or indiscriminate,” the report read. “The fact that the building was hit four times strongly suggests that the munitions were intended to hit the building and that the strike was not the result of a malfunction or misdirection.”
Human Rights Watch found that 54 children were killed by the strikes; Airwars identified 62 children. Three of the children had been playing soccer outside of the building when they were crushed.
“The back of his head was cracked open, one of his legs seemed barely connected to his body and part of his face was burned, but he seemed to be alive,” one of the boys’ fathers said, of finding his 11-year-old son buried in the rubble. “We freed him in seconds, but he died in the ambulance. We buried him the same day.”
Others described losing tens of family members in the attack.
“There was nothing worrying at all before the attack. Almost all of us were sitting in two rooms, one for men and one for women. Some of us were laughing. We had just baked bread. There were no signs or warning or any feeling of danger. We felt safe because it was an apartment building full of civilians,” said Ameera Shaheen, who was residing with her family in the Engineers’ Building after being forced by the Israeli military to flee their home in central Gaza the day before the attack. Shaheen lost 20 of her relatives in the airstrike.
“The staggering number of Palestinian deaths, mostly women and children, shows deadly disregard for civilian life and points to many more possible war crimes that need to be investigated,” said Gerry Simpson, associate crisis and conflict director for Human Rights Watch. “Other governments should press the Israeli government to end unlawful attacks, and immediately halt arms transfers to Israel to save civilian lives and avoid complicity in war crimes.”
We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.
As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.
Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.
As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.
At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.
Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.
You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.