Skip to content Skip to footer

Is Iran Undergoing a Political Shift?

Some interesting developments out of Iran are showing that a demand for popular power is growing.

Naqsh-e Jahan Square, Esfahan, Iran. (Photo: Blondin Rikard)

Is Iran on a path towards more progressive laws? Some interesting developments out of the country are showing that a demand for popular power is growing. Support for political inclusion, via referendums voted on by the people, might have the potential to shift power within the country. However, to understand why these ideas are an advancement, let’s take a quick look at the Iranian political system.

For the most part, Iranian politics seem similar to most political systems found around the world. There is a President who is elected along with members of parliament who create and vote on laws. But there’s a second layer to the Iranian government. This lies in the Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, who is in charge of the army and creating policies and trends within the country.

It’s a hard job and he simply cannot do it alone, so instead the Ayatollah appoints the Council of Guardians to oversee Parliament and help steer the country in the direction he sees fit. As you can imagine, with such control over the Parliamentary systems, there isn’t much room for dissent.

Yet recently the elected President of Iran, Hassan Rouhani, has called for referendums to be introduced into the country. Speaking at a conference, he was quoted as saying, “It will be good to, after 36 years, even for once, or even every 10 years if we implement this principle of the Constitution, and put important economic, social and cultural issues to a direct referendum instead of to the Parliament.”

Since Iranian youth and culture has liberalized considerably in the past few years, this sets a dangerous paradigm for members of Parliament and the Ayatollah to consider. The cultural divide in Iran between those under 30 and those who went through the 1979 revolution is considerable. Sources close to the government dismissed the idea as a distraction, telling reporters the president was underestimating the difficulty of organizing a referendum.

President Rouhani also made headlines last year when he banned the morality police (yes that really is a thing there) from arresting women for being ‘inappropriately dressed.’

Yet it does seem that the Council of Guardians is listening to the general public after they struck down a strict new law that made its way through Parliament. Dubbed the “Plan on Protection of Promoters of Virtue and Vice,” the law would have clamped down on recent gains made by Iranian women. For instance, it authorized verbal warnings to be given out to women who didn’t meet dress codes. Employers would also be held responsible for ensuring their female employees came to work dressed appropriately. Companies that didn’t enforce dress codes would have been subject to fines.

Dress codes have relaxed considerably inside the country. Where once women were expected to wear loose, black chadors, these days women can often be seen in skinny jeans, tight jackets and hijabs (headscarves) worn far back on their heads. Men’s fashion has also undergone a shift, with a rise in contemporary western styles.

In 2009, the Green Revolution shook Iran as thousands of youth activists took to the streets and demanded change from the strict regime. While the moderate nature of their new president has given many a hope that they can change government from within, many still worry that as long as there’s a religious council dictating life, moving forward will be a struggle.

We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.

As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.

Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.

As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.

At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.

Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.

You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.