Health care and food processors are different.
When it comes to health care, it is both right and smart for me – and everyone I come into contact with – to have health care. On the other hand, I couldn’t care less about my parents’ food processor.
I should be embarrassed to say the same thing about my parents’ health care. It would be both wrong and dumb to say so. Why?
When (not “if”) my parents get sick and injured, my life and my family’s life and the life of my brothers and sisters will change dramatically, especially if they do not have good health care. If they lack secure health care, it is highly likely if not certain that:
My parents will suffer terribly because good care will be beyond their financial means; My family and the families of my brothers and sisters will likely go bankrupt trying to help them.
This is immoral and it’s bad economics.
How many people have parents who do not have good health care coverage? Millions of Americans (including one of the authors) are in this situation right now. Are you one of them? If so, you understand how frightening it can be to think about them getting older and eventually getting sick. If not, you can easily imagine what this situation is like.
But this is how our current market-based, for-profit health insurance system has been working for decade upon decade. Health care is not seen as a basic human need; it is a food processor, an extra-good to have if you can get it, but not essential. As a result, hard-working people and their families are suffering, dying and going bankrupt every day, while insurance companies make billions in profits.
This is wrong. Which is why no other industrialized country acts this way.
So, let’s start with some basic ideas: Good health is a human need.
While many think of health care as a privilege to be “earned,” others with more compassion consider it to be a basic human right. But even this doesn’t go far enough. Good health is a basic need. Abraham Maslow, back in 1943, presented the hierarchy of needs
Without health security, a fulfilling life is impossible. Everyone should have the care they need to be healthy when they are sick or injured.
The denial of basic needs is wrong, plain and simple. One of the guiding moral principles of the United States is the guarantee of “life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.” This idea is so deeply engrained in the American character that we feel it in our bones. And yet, at the most basic level of health security, we have failed our American family. This is a moral failure. And it must be righted to remove the blemish from our souls. How can we live with ourselves when we let private greed dictate the lives of our loved ones, especially when it leads to senseless suffering and death for so many? We all benefit when it happens, whether the people needing care are our parents, our kids, our co-workers, people sitting next to us at church, the restaurant employees who serve our food, or ourselves.
Universal health care is more than the right thing to do. It is also the smart thing to do. An economy can’t run when sickness is widespread. Small businesses can’t grow and thrive when their employees are at risk of bankruptcy from an unexpected illness. Large companies can’t compete in the global marketplace while carrying the risk of private health for their workers. The only way to secure economic health is to guarantee that everyone has the capacity for physical health.
Can anyone really support the idea that Americans don’t deserve health care when they are sick or injured?
So, how do we get it? Single payer. Or, at a minimum, a rigorous public option.
We know that the current system doesn’t work for over 100 million Americans who are underinsured or don’t have insurance at all. These are people who need it like pregnant couples, sick people (from cancer victims to people with toe fungus), and small business owners. Insurance companies have had over three decades to work this out and they haven’t been able to do it.
But they’ve made some good money in their failure.
So, let’s go back to the basic issue here. Everyone gets care when they need it. Period. Single payer or a robust public option are the only real solutions because health care is decidedly NOT like a food processor. Those who act otherwise need a lesson in compassion.
Now is the moment of truth. It is un-American to sit idly by and allow our neighbors to suffer needlessly. It is un-American to allow our neighbors to lose their homes to pay for medical expenses. It is un-American to condemn millions of people to agonize about money in the face of life-threatening illness.
We must rise to our moral aspirations and guarantee a basic need for ALL AMERICANS. Or, we can judge our brothers and sisters unworthy of basic health and condemn the pursuit of life, liberty and happiness to the shadows of history.
————
Eric Haas and Joe Brewer are consulting partners at Cognitive Policy Works. They offer consulting and coaching services, based on insights from the cognitive sciences, to health care advocates and progressive organizations.
We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.
As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.
Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.
As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.
At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.
Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.
You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.