Baghdad — Iraqi lawmakers reached a minutes-to-midnight deal late Sunday, clearing a path to national elections early next year that are seen as crucial to a smooth U.S. troop withdrawal.
The Iraqi parliament approved a revised elections law that expands the parliament from 275 to 325 seats, and redistributes them among the country’s 18 provinces to satisfy sparring religious sects and ethnic groups.
No final date for the elections was set, but the United Nations has proposed that they take place Feb. 27. The elections were supposed to have taken place in January, a date made moot by weeks of political fighting that increasingly took on sectarian overtones.
The elections, and Iraq’s political stability, are critical to President Barack Obama’s hopes of withdrawing all U.S. combat troops by August 2010, leaving some 50,000 U.S. military personnel here.
The final deal, voted on at about 11:45 p.m. Baghdad time, came only after repeated intervention by U.S. diplomats and U.N. advisers here, according to Iraqi lawmakers and other officials.
They said that Obama administration officials pushed hard on leaders of Iraq’s ethnic Kurds to accept fewer seats than they were demanding for their semi-autonomous northern region. The Kurds’ eventual, if reluctant, agreement sealed the deal.
“If it wasn’t for the American intervention in the first degree … the law today would not have passed,” said Salih Mutlak, a Sunni Arab lawmaker. “This is the first time that the Americans use wisdom and logic and pressure the Kurds.”
“The Americans didn’t place pressures, but they gave us important guarantees and tomorrow the White House will probably issue a statement about it,” said Feriad Rawanduzi, a Kurdish parliament member. The guarantees, he said, include a census next year in Iraq _the country hasn’t had one since 1987 — and U.N. help in settling Arab-Kurd disputes over a broad swath of territory, including the oil-rich Kirkuk region.
“We must say that the result was acceptable to a certain limit, there was no other alternative,” Rawanduzi said.
Parliament passed an original elections law Nov. 8, but it was vetoed by one of the country’s two vice presidents, Tariq el Hashimi. Hashimi, a Sunni complained that it didn’t give enough representation to an estimated 2 million Iraqis who have fled the country, many of whom are believed to be Sunni Muslims.
Sunday night’s session took place under the threat of another veto by Hashimi if his demands were not met, and the specter of a political vacuum and reignited violence.
In the end, all sides appear to have won something from the deal. Sunnis got greater representation, Kurdish areas increased their seats in parliament from 35 to 43, and Shia Muslims, who form Iraq’s majority, also got more clout.
While agreements have been reached in the past only to fall apart, there were high hopes that this one would stick. Hashimi withdrew his veto threat early Monday morning.
“We are talking about rescuing the whole political process … democracy in Iraq,” said Omar al Mashhadani, spokesman for parliament speaker Iyad Samarrai.
Dulaimy is a McClatchy special correspondent.
We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.
As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.
Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.
As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.
At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.
Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.
You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.