Experts say Iran’s plans to build 10 new nuclear plants is not within its capabilities for years, but Iran President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad said they would manufacture 500,000 new centrifuges.
Two days after the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) censured Iran for its nuclear program, the Islamic Republic announced Sunday that it would build another 10 uranium enrichment plants the size of the Natanz facility already in operation.
Iran’s Mehr News agency reports that construction of five facilities could begin within two months. In a speech on Sunday, Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad said the facilities were necessary to meet the country’s goal to eventually generate up to 20,000 megawatt-hours of electricity every year. The new program would also require an additional 500,000 new centrifuges.
More than powering Iran, or even potentially creating nuclear weapons – as many in the international community fear Iran is trying to do – the program seems to be more bluster in the face of increasing diplomatic pressure than a realistic plan to develop the country’s nuclear program. According to nuclear experts, the scope of Iran’s proposal vastly exceeds the country’s demonstrated capabilities.
Some experts have asserted that Iran simply does not have the industrial capabilities to produce the centrifuges required by the program, reports the Los Angeles Times. Currently Iran has installed only 8,000 centrifuges, far from the 500,000 required by the Cabinet’s new program. Of those 8,000, only half are currently producing reactor-grade uranium, reports the Times. Iran expert Gary Sick told the paper that the proposed program would likely not be in place before 2030.
“If they actually mean it, given the pace of their production and installation of working centrifuges, we are looking at an extremely costly 20- or 30-year program, at best,” said [Dr.] Sick, a professor of Middle East studies at Columbia University who served on the National Security Council during Iran’s 1979 revolution. “Words are easy. Implementation is hard.”
Some of the claims made by Iran on Sunday – such as Mr. Ahmadinejad’s threat to enrich uranium for a medical reactor at a higher level than that needed for nuclear fuel – simply don’t make sense from a technical perspective, reported the BBC.
However, Iran cannot produce the fuel rods from such materials. Only France and Argentina can, according to experts. So again the motivation is not clear, beyond defiance.
The head of the Atomic Energy Organization of Iran, Ali Akbar Salehi, appeared to support this thesis when he said on an Iranian state-run radio that the government had not planned to build the facilities until it was criticized by the UN nuclear watchdog. The Jerusalem Post reports that Mr. Salehi and others in the Iranian government felt their country needed to “issue a strong response” to the IAEA resolution.
Iran’s state-run Press TV reports that “some Western powers, spearheaded by the US, have been pressuring Iran to accept an inflexible nuclear draft deal.” The agency reports that the agreement would require Iran’s nuclear fuel to be shipped outside its borders for enrichment, but that there would be no guarantee that it would receive the fuel it requires.
“We had no plan to build many nuclear sites like [enrichment facility in the central city of] Natanz but it seems that the West do not want to comprehend Iran’s message of peace,” Head of the Atomic Energy Organization of Iran Ali-Akbar Salehi said.
“The West adopted an attitude toward Iran which made the Iranian government to pass the ratification on construction of ten sites similar to the Natanz enrichment facility,” he added.
Truthout Is Preparing to Meet Trump’s Agenda With Resistance at Every Turn
Dear Truthout Community,
If you feel rage, despondency, confusion and deep fear today, you are not alone. We’re feeling it too. We are heartsick. Facing down Trump’s fascist agenda, we are desperately worried about the most vulnerable people among us, including our loved ones and everyone in the Truthout community, and our minds are racing a million miles a minute to try to map out all that needs to be done.
We must give ourselves space to grieve and feel our fear, feel our rage, and keep in the forefront of our mind the stark truth that millions of real human lives are on the line. And simultaneously, we’ve got to get to work, take stock of our resources, and prepare to throw ourselves full force into the movement.
Journalism is a linchpin of that movement. Even as we are reeling, we’re summoning up all the energy we can to face down what’s coming, because we know that one of the sharpest weapons against fascism is publishing the truth.
There are many terrifying planks to the Trump agenda, and we plan to devote ourselves to reporting thoroughly on each one and, crucially, covering the movements resisting them. We also recognize that Trump is a dire threat to journalism itself, and that we must take this seriously from the outset.
Last week, the four of us sat down to have some hard but necessary conversations about Truthout under a Trump presidency. How would we defend our publication from an avalanche of far right lawsuits that seek to bankrupt us? How would we keep our reporters safe if they need to cover outbreaks of political violence, or if they are targeted by authorities? How will we urgently produce the practical analysis, tools and movement coverage that you need right now — breaking through our normal routines to meet a terrifying moment in ways that best serve you?
It will be a tough, scary four years to produce social justice-driven journalism. We need to deliver news, strategy, liberatory ideas, tools and movement-sparking solutions with a force that we never have had to before. And at the same time, we desperately need to protect our ability to do so.
We know this is such a painful moment and donations may understandably be the last thing on your mind. But we must ask for your support, which is needed in a new and urgent way.
We promise we will kick into an even higher gear to give you truthful news that cuts against the disinformation and vitriol and hate and violence. We promise to publish analyses that will serve the needs of the movements we all rely on to survive the next four years, and even build for the future. We promise to be responsive, to recognize you as members of our community with a vital stake and voice in this work.
Please dig deep if you can, but a donation of any amount will be a truly meaningful and tangible action in this cataclysmic historical moment.
We’re with you. Let’s do all we can to move forward together.
With love, rage, and solidarity,
Maya, Negin, Saima, and Ziggy