Sharon Lavigne and Geraldine Mayho took me to meet some of the most vulnerable members of their community, handicapped residents of St. James, Louisiana, who live near a terminal where the Bayou Bridge pipeline will end. “These people have no way of getting out if there is a spill or explosion,” Lavigne told me. She explained with only one road in and out of the area, if the pipeline fails or an industrial accident occurs, “we are all trapped back here.”
St. James is a predominantly low-income, African-American town of less than 1,000. It is located in the middle of a highly industrialized stretch of land along the Mississippi River, between Baton Rouge and New Orleans, known as Cancer Alley. The town is part of St. James Parish’s 5th District, an area that has transformed from mostly rural to industrial over the last decade.
Numerous industrial projects including the Bayou Bridge pipeline currently are being built here.
The Louisiana governor’s office recently announced the Taiwan- based Formosa Petrochemical Corp. purchased a 2,400-acre site along the west bank of the Mississippi River near the Sunshine Bridge, at the district’s edge. The company plans to build a $9.4 billion chemical manufacturing complex that it is branding as “the Sunshine Project.”
But Lavigne and Mayho see it as one more nail in their coffins because they don’t believe a chemical manufacturing complex can operate so closely to their homes without adding to the air pollution their community already endures.
The new industrial facilities and infrastructure like the Bayou Bridge pipeline will join a large number of oil storage tanks that were built close to many homes on St. James’ Burton Lane, where I visited and shot portraits of some of the residents with restricted mobility.
Oil Pipeline Pushback
Lavigne and Mayho are members of the Humanitarian Enterprise of Loving People (H.E.L.P), an organization of concerned citizens who have been pushing for an emergency evacuation route from their community to be established. The group also has been resisting the influx of industrial projects being built near their homes.
Members of HELP, including Pastor Harry Joseph of the Mt. Triumph Baptist Church, learned about the proposed 162.5 mile Bayou Bridge pipeline in January of 2017 from Louisiana-based environmental groups opposed to it and joined the fight to stop it. The oil pipeline, a joint venture between Energy Transfer Partners and Phillips 66, is being built across southern Louisiana from Lake Charles near the Texas border to a railway terminal in St. James.
Before the end of 2017, the Bayou Bridge pipeline received all the necessary state and federal permits and Energy Transfer Partners began construction, despite legal challenges at both the state and federal level. Earthjustice, an environmental nonprofit law firm, filed a lawsuit challenging a portion of a US Army Corps of Engineers permit issued for the Atchafalaya Basin, an environmentally sensitive river swamp that is a National Heritage Area and habitat for wild crawfish.
The Tulane Environmental Law Clinic filed the state case on behalf of H.E.L.P and two environmental groups, the Gulf Restoration Network and Atchafalaya Basinkeeper, against the Louisiana Department of Natural Resources (DNR). This lawsuit questions the legality of a state coastal zone permit for the last 18 miles of the pipeline, where it ends in St. James. A state court agreed DNR did not follow state guidelines and issued the permit despite the project’s lack of adequate environmental and emergency response plans for St. James in case of pipeline failure, but the agency is appealing.
While pipeline opponents won initial victories at the state and federal level, construction has continued, and the legal battles have too. Bayou Bridge LLC expects the work to be complete by October 2018, which could be before either case is heard in court.
State Court Ruling Disappoints St. James
“We were so happy when we heard the judge ruled in our favor,” Lavigne said, but that feeling dissipated quickly.
Judge Alvin Turner, Jr.’s April 30 ruling stated DNR could not issue a permit until St. James was provided an emergency evacuation plan. His decision in essence invalidated the permit but didn’t legally compel DNR, which is appealing, to stop the construction already underway.
Lisa Jordan of Tulane Environmental Law Clinic thought the ruling called for the work to stop because it stated the coastal zone permit couldn’t be issued until an evacuation plan was created. But DNR doesn’t agree. According to DNR, the ongoing work in the coastal zone is still permissible until after its legal appeal.
Jordan challenged DNR’s position, alleging that the agency was in contempt of court for not stopping the work until the appeal is heard unless an evacuation plan is created.
Judge Turner, who ruled in the community’s favor, was scheduled on July 3 to hear Jordan’s arguments about why DNR should stop construction during the appeals process, but the hearing was canceled. Jordan said, “It was explained to me that Turner no longer had standing as the case had been transferred to the appellate court.”
“I’m very disappointed in Judge Turner. I thought he cared about this community and was going to be our savior,” Lavigne said. She is also disappointed that DNR would allow pipeline construction to continue unabated during the appeal.
Jordan hasn’t lost faith that the lawsuit will result in an evacuation plan for the community, even though the pipeline will likely be finished before DNR’s appeal plays out. “If we win, DNR will be responsible to make sure an evacuation route is created,” she said.
Lavigne isn’t very hopeful at this point. “The people making decisions for us only care about money,” she said. Lavigne doesn’t believe anything will change until after there is a disaster of some kind in the community.
UPDATE 7/13/18: On July 13, Jordan filed a motion asking the appellate court to expedite the appeals process for DNR.
Truthout Is Preparing to Meet Trump’s Agenda With Resistance at Every Turn
Dear Truthout Community,
If you feel rage, despondency, confusion and deep fear today, you are not alone. We’re feeling it too. We are heartsick. Facing down Trump’s fascist agenda, we are desperately worried about the most vulnerable people among us, including our loved ones and everyone in the Truthout community, and our minds are racing a million miles a minute to try to map out all that needs to be done.
We must give ourselves space to grieve and feel our fear, feel our rage, and keep in the forefront of our mind the stark truth that millions of real human lives are on the line. And simultaneously, we’ve got to get to work, take stock of our resources, and prepare to throw ourselves full force into the movement.
Journalism is a linchpin of that movement. Even as we are reeling, we’re summoning up all the energy we can to face down what’s coming, because we know that one of the sharpest weapons against fascism is publishing the truth.
There are many terrifying planks to the Trump agenda, and we plan to devote ourselves to reporting thoroughly on each one and, crucially, covering the movements resisting them. We also recognize that Trump is a dire threat to journalism itself, and that we must take this seriously from the outset.
After the election, the four of us sat down to have some hard but necessary conversations about Truthout under a Trump presidency. How would we defend our publication from an avalanche of far right lawsuits that seek to bankrupt us? How would we keep our reporters safe if they need to cover outbreaks of political violence, or if they are targeted by authorities? How will we urgently produce the practical analysis, tools and movement coverage that you need right now — breaking through our normal routines to meet a terrifying moment in ways that best serve you?
It will be a tough, scary four years to produce social justice-driven journalism. We need to deliver news, strategy, liberatory ideas, tools and movement-sparking solutions with a force that we never have had to before. And at the same time, we desperately need to protect our ability to do so.
We know this is such a painful moment and donations may understandably be the last thing on your mind. But we must ask for your support, which is needed in a new and urgent way.
We promise we will kick into an even higher gear to give you truthful news that cuts against the disinformation and vitriol and hate and violence. We promise to publish analyses that will serve the needs of the movements we all rely on to survive the next four years, and even build for the future. We promise to be responsive, to recognize you as members of our community with a vital stake and voice in this work.
Please dig deep if you can, but a donation of any amount will be a truly meaningful and tangible action in this cataclysmic historical moment.
We’re with you. Let’s do all we can to move forward together.
With love, rage, and solidarity,
Maya, Negin, Saima, and Ziggy