Skip to content Skip to footer

Idaho GOP Sets Party Line Against Life-Saving Exception for Abortions

Delegates at the state convention voted nearly four to one against endorsing a life-saving exception for abortion.

A group of teenagers protests the Supreme Court's decision in the Dobbs v Jackson Women's Health case on July 2, 2022, in Driggs, Idaho.

Idaho Republicans, at their annual convention over the weekend, affirmed anti-abortion stances in their official party platform — and voted to make no exceptions to abortion bans when a person’s life is threatened due to pregnancy.

When given the opportunity to vote on a single exception to allow for abortion when a person’s life depends on it (including for nonviable pregnancies, like ectopic pregnancies), the Republicans soundly rejected the idea.

By a vote of 412 GOP delegates to 164, the party voted against an amendment to the anti-abortion provision in the platform, which would have allowed for the exception to be the official stance of Idaho Republicans.

The provision does explicitly state that miscarriages — whose treatments are often the same as those for an abortion — would not be criminalized. But in addition to containing no life-saving exceptions for abortions, the platform also makes no exceptions for rape or incest, defining any abortion as “murder from the moment of fertilization.”

Such language defies widespread medical consensus about pregnancies — a fertilized egg is not considered the start of a pregnancy, as the development of any zygote requires implantation to start. Indeed, many fertilized eggs are expelled from the body naturally through menstruation, if they are not implanted on the uterine wall.

It’s highly possible that the Idaho Republican Party’s definitions and restrictions will become law in the state — the GOP currently has a supermajority in the state legislature, and the state’s anti-abortion Republican governor, Brad Little, is expected to win reelection this fall.

Idaho is set to become one of the most restrictive states in the country when it comes to abortion. A trigger law in the state was set to go into effect 30 days after a Supreme Court decision overturning Roe v. Wade was handed down, which happened in late June. However, abortion rights organizations and providers are suing the state to block the trigger law, with a judicial hearing set for August 3.

The trigger law bans the procedure at all stages of pregnancy. It contains limited exceptions, though in some cases these allowances are rendered moot by procedural issues. While victims of rape are legally allowed to obtain an abortion, they can only access the procedure after providing documentation of a police report — a requirement that makes the exception almost meaningless, since police reports aren’t ordinarily released during ongoing inquiries. Many victims of sexual assault or rape are uninclined to file police reports for myriad reasons, especially if they fear how those who assaulted them will respond to such filings.

We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.

As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.

Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.

As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.

At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.

Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.

You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.