Skip to content Skip to footer

Louisiana Republican’s Bill Opens Door to Homicide Charges for Abortion Patients

The proposal includes language that justifies banning abortion based on the religious views of its author.

A sign reading "Mind Your Own Uterus" is taped on the check-in window at the Hope Medical Group for Women in Shreveport, Louisiana, April 19, 2022.

A legislative committee in the Louisiana House of Representatives has advanced a bill that would expose a person to homicide charges if they receive an abortion in the state.

The bill, sponsored by state GOP Rep. Danny McCormick, comes after a draft opinion from the U.S. Supreme Court was leaked earlier this week, which suggested the Court was set to overturn the precedents established in Roe v. Wade, a 1973 case that recognized the right to abortion throughout the country.

Although the leaked document shows majority support by the Court, the ruling will not go into effect until it becomes official. McCormick said the matter was too important to wait for the justices to make it official, however.

“We can’t wait on the Supreme Court,” McCormick said.

The bill would define a person’s life as starting at fertilization, and would only allow abortion to occur in order to save a person’s life. The bill also makes an exception for punishment against a person who has an abortion if they were coerced or forced into having one by another individual.

House Bill 813, titled “The Abolition of Abortion in Louisiana Act,” justifies the banning of abortion, in part, by citing religious beliefs, and states that criminalizing the act is necessary to preserve “the sanctity of human life, created in the image of God.” The bill would outlaw abortion and define personhood “from fertilization” onward.

The bill also claims that it cannot be stricken down by any future law established by the federal government, through a Supreme Court ruling or an act from Congress, defying the basic tenets of constitutional hierarchy.

If passed, it’s possible that a person who has an abortion in Louisiana could be charged with murder, and subsequently punished with imprisonment.

Besides outlawing the basic human right to abortion, the bill has other glaring problems, opponents of the measure said — including creating additional obstacles for individuals that are seeking to become parents but who are facing fertility issues. Because the bill defines fertilization as the basis for when human life begins, the discarding of fertilized eggs in the in vitro fertilization process would be deemed illegal.

Some forms of birth control could also be outlawed under the bill, as certain medications are designed not only to prevent fertilization but to also stop a fertilized egg from implanting inside a uterus.

Medical experts agree that fertilization is not the point at which pregnancy occurs — it is when implantation happens that a fertilized egg is able to start developing.

The bill is unique for other reasons as well. It contradicts a long-standing Republican talking point on abortion — that planned punishments for the procedure, should they be allowed after Roe is tossed aside, would only occur for those who perform abortions, not on those seeking them.

“Republicans told us for years that they would never punish women who get abortions,” noted Mark Joseph Stern, senior writer for Slate, in a tweet discussing the bill. “Now that Roe’s about to fall, they’re racing to authorize the arrest, prosecution, and imprisonment of abortion patients for murder.”

We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.

As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.

Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.

As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.

At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.

Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.

You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.