A new Republican-sponsored bill in Idaho would remove two exceptions that exist in the state’s already highly restrictive abortion law, a move that critics are lambasting as going in the wrong direction for the state.
Polling in this very conservative state indicates that most residents agree — the abortion law needs changes that would reduce restrictions on accessing the procedure.
Current abortion law in Idaho forbids abortion at any stage of a pregnancy. Exceptions are allowed to protect the life of a pregnant person and are granted in cases of rape or incest — however, the state requires anyone seeking those exceptions to provide documented proof of their attack from law enforcement. Critics say the requirement is cruel, given that many victims of sexual assault do not inform the police immediately after being harmed.
“Anyone who is pregnant in Idaho as a result of rape should be able to access resources and health care in their pursuit of healing and justice – they should not be treated as a criminal,” said ACLU of Idaho’s communication director Rebecca De León.
Even with the difficulties and deep restrictions that exist with the current law, Idaho Sen. Dan Foreman (R) wants to take things further. Last week, he introduced a bill that would remove the rape and incest exceptions altogether.
Critics are panning the bill as moving the law in the wrong direction.
“Even among states with a six- or 12-week ban, the fact that Idaho’s law leaves no exception for a woman’s health or fetal anomaly stands out,” wrote The Lewiston Tribune’s editorial board. “The dilemma is driving physicians out of the state. … Now Foreman wants to subject a physician who performs an abortion for a victim of rape and incest to a felony conviction, a prison sentence of two to five years and the loss of his license.”
“Why does Foreman, a former cop, have more sympathy for the rapist than the victim?” the board asked.
State Democratic lawmakers and abortion rights advocates also criticized the bill.
“We’ve already seen the impacts the current abortion ban has had on the state, and instead of working to make it better, those in power are trying to see how far they can take us backward,” said Planned Parenthood Alliance Advocates communication manager Mack Smith.
“That the state would force a 12-year-old rape victim to carry a pregnancy is a shocking idea, and Sen. Foreman is clearly out of step with the values of the vast majority of Idahoans,” Rep. Lauren Necochea (D) said.
Recent polling indicates Foreman is right.
According to the Idaho Public Policy Survey, which was published this month, only 33.4 percent of residents in the state support keeping the abortion law as it is. Nearly six in 10 voters (57.9 percent) want abortion rights expanded to some degree — of that number, 24.3 percent want the state’s abortion law to include protecting the health, not just the life, of the pregnant person, and allow abortion as an option for nonviable pregnancies; 14.4 percent want abortion to be allowed until fetal viability (usually around 20-24 weeks of pregnancy); and 19.2 percent want no restrictions on abortion.
The poll did not ask respondents to weigh in on further restricting abortion in the state.
We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.
As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.
Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.
As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.
At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.
Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.
You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.