This video was released as part of Bill McKibben’s global awareness-building
exercise last week for 350.org, an organization promoting the idea that carbon
emission levels above 350 parts per million are dangerous:
I’d like to treat this as a case study in visual metaphors and conceptual
frames to show how insights into human cognition are vital for effective climate
This video contains several innovative elements that are worthy of note. I’ll
consider each in turn.
Human thought is profoundly metaphorical. Our most basic concepts are grounded
in the bodily experience and “abstracted” through metaphorical extensions.
We understand knowledge through several bodily activities such as grasping (I
get what you’re saying), seeing (That explanation is a bit murky), eating
(I find that hard to swallow) and physical forces (Relativity theory just about
blew my mind).
These metaphors are all conceptual. They are found in every human language. They
are also involved in spatial and auditory reasoning. This video makes use of visual
metaphors that are designed to make profound points through the experience of
watching it. Here are a few of them I noticed:
Emotional (sexual) energy is physical heat.
A layer of clothing is one unit of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere.
The “natural state” of nudity is the “natural state”
of our global climate system (undisturbed by global warming).
Each of these metaphors is activated through gesturing and movement. Thus it is
expressed visually in the video. It becomes active in our language when we “put
words” to them and articulate our understanding of these ideas.
Making Climate Action Sexy
A major theme of this video is that solving the climate crisis is a natural compulsion
(another metaphor!) just like having a sex drive is an innate quality for human
beings. It playfully asserts that engagement with the challenges we face in dealing
with climate can be pleasurable and fun.
What’s more, the final moments of the video set up the pressure to “finish
the job” and get those last two parts per million out of the way. A clear
and powerful objective has been set up (for those who find supermodels sexy) to
get down to “bare essentials” where these people most like to be.
Deconstructing the Fashion Industry
Each layer of clothing fits within the supermodel frame, meaning that the style
of garments represent the glamor and extravagance of the fashion industry. As
the models remove each article of clothing, they are promoting the idea that all
these layers are not only unnecessary, but they are bad for us.
This puts the fashion industry in a precarious position. If all those layers of
extravagance (metaphorically implied as causing the heating problem) are harmful
AND unnecessary, we can and should return to simpler forms of pleasure (like sexual
interaction with those who appeal to us and, by extension, other kinds of simple
pleasures) that do not contribute to the disruption of global climate.
An Image Schema That Leaves (Some of) Us Wanting More
Another key insight about human cognition is that we have body-based concepts
for using our bodies in the world. These include core capacities to maintain balance,
move along a trajectory, recognize containers, and so on. Each of these capacities
requires what are called “image schemas” or schematic concepts for
acting out our plans in the world. Two key image schemas in this video are the
BALANCE SCHEMA and the SOURCE-PATH-GOAL SCHEMA.
The BALANCE SCHEMA arises when we feel drawn toward or away from a physical object.
The metaphor sex appeal is physical attraction makes this evident. We are “pulled”
toward the things that attract us and remain “unbalanced” until
we either resist the pull or make contact with the source of attraction.
The SOURCE-PATH-GOAL SCHEMA is set up throughout the entire video. As the models
reveal that their intention is to remove articles of clothing in a continuing
sequence, a trajectory appears in our understanding of what is going on that “leads
to” the culminating point where the model is naked.
Those of us who find this end state desirable are left “unbalanced”
at the end of the video. These people feel a compulsion to act. This forms the
motivational drive to reduce carbon emissions. If, according to the metaphors
involved, the only way to achieve the natural state of nakedness is to reduce
carbon dioxide levels back to their undisturbed state, this compulsion will remain
active and unbalanced until sufficient climate action has been achieved.
Being Evocative Through Controversy
Some readers will find this video offensive. There is plenty of controversy around
the objectification of women, idolization of celebrities (including supermodels),
and the use of sex to “sell” climate change.
I see these controversies as very effective from a marketing perspective. The
two motivating tendencies for sharing this video – and it is clearly going
viral at the moment with over 109,000 views at the time of this writing –
are (1) people who felt good about the video and wanted to share and (2) people
who were appalled at the video and felt the need to complain about it. Both of
these tendencies are driving the viral spread of the video.
Closing Comment – Understand Your Political Mind
Every part of this analysis shows that human cognition has many central roles
in the spread of ideas. It is vital that social change advocates of all stripes
learn more about the workings of our minds and the political/cultural ramifications
of this knowledge.
Update: I clarified the metaphor “emotional
energy is physical heat” with “sexual” in parentheses to
suggest that some viewers would read sexual connotations into it while others
simply see it as a general emotional warming as the women go from feeling physically
cold to being exuberant and energetic at the end.
Joe Brewer is a cognitive scientist turned social change strategist who consults with advocacy organizations of all kinds to bring us closer to a sustainable world. Reach him herewww.cognitivepolicyworks.com
Not everyone can pay for the news. But if you can, we need your support.
Truthout is widely read among people with lower incomes and among young people who are mired in debt. Our site is read at public libraries, among people without internet access of their own. People print out our articles and send them to family members in prison — we receive letters from behind bars regularly thanking us for our coverage. Our stories are emailed and shared around communities, sparking grassroots mobilization.
We’re committed to keeping all Truthout articles free and available to the public. But in order to do that, we need those who can afford to contribute to our work to do so — especially now, because we have just 8 days left to raise $45,000 in critical funds.
We’ll never require you to give, but we can ask you from the bottom of our hearts: Will you donate what you can, so we can continue providing journalism in the service of justice and truth?