The U.S. House of Representatives has approved a motion to vacate the office of Speaker of the House, removing Rep. Kevin McCarthy (R-California) from the position nearly nine months to the day after he assumed the role.
Rep. Matt Gaetz (R-Florida) filed the motion to vacate on Monday, citing McCarthy’s refusal to use the threat of a government shutdown to negotiate draconian cuts to social programs and impose harsher immigration standards. The vote commenced on Tuesday afternoon, with 216 members of Congress in favor of removing McCarthy from the speakership and 210 opposed.
Nearly all Democratic lawmakers in the chamber (208 in total, with four votes absent) voted for the motion, with eight Republicans joining them. All of the “no” votes came from Republicans.
Shortly after the vote, in a closed session of the Republican conference, McCarthy said that he wouldn’t seek the speakership again when the vote to choose a new leader of the House happens sometime next week. All votes in the House that were scheduled for later this week have been suspended until that time, although Rep. Patrick McHenry (R-North Carolina) will serve as speaker pro tempore until a new speaker is picked.
When he closed out the day’s business, McHenry, who opposed the motion to vacate, slammed the gavel disapprovingly.
McCarthy’s tenure is the shortest of any speaker of the House since 1869. It is the first time in U.S. history that a speaker has been removed from the position through a motion to vacate vote.
As of right now, it appears that Rep. Steve Scalise (R-Louisiana), the House Majority Leader, is the most likely candidate to become speaker. He has reportedly been making calls to lawmakers to garner their support.
It’s unclear whether Scalise or any other Republican lawmaker will be successful in becoming the next speaker of the House right away, or if they will have to face multiple ballots across several days before someone is selected, as McCarthy did in January.
“There is a real possibility for a long delay in finding a replacement speaker,” legal expert Omar Ochoa said in an email to Truthout. “And that may cause major disruptions in the operations of the federal government.”
Political commentators have stressed that the events of the past week are unprecedented.
“We’re in uncharted territory. We’ve never had this situation before,” Matthew Green, a political science professor at the Catholic University of America, told CBS News.
Even though Scalise appears to be the frontrunner, Republican lawmakers have indicated to Democrats that they do not know who will be chosen to lead the House.
“On the way out [of the chamber], three different Republicans told me three different names of people that they thought might be the next speaker,” Rep. Jamie Raskin (D-Maryland) told Axios reporter Andrew Solender.
We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.
As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.
Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.
As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.
At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.
Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.
You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.