Democrats on the House Judiciary Committee are investigating whether officials in the Department of Justice (DOJ) during the Trump administration engaged in a “shadow operation” against individuals perceived to be adversaries of the former president.
House Judiciary chair Rep. Jerry Nadler (D-New York) will focus the committee’s inquiry into who at the Justice Department might have approved the subpoenas for the phone records of a number of individuals, including at least two Democratic lawmakers and their families, during the Trump years.
Earlier this month, it was revealed that the phone data for Reps. Adam Schiff (D-California) and Eric Swalwell (D-California) were obtained by the DOJ in 2017 and 2018. The phone records of some of their aides and family members were also obtained by the department, ostensibly as part of an investigation into leaks to the press that had been embarrassing to the White House and former President Donald Trump.
The investigation at the DOJ began during the tenure of former Attorney General Jeff Sessions, but was eventually dropped. After William Barr became attorney general, the inquiry was resumed, but no evidence of any wrongdoing by the two lawmakers was ever found.
Both Schiff and Swalwell were ardent critics of the Trump administration.
Barr and Sessions have both denied knowing about the subpoenas, which raises a bigger question: how did the investigation get approved in the first place? Such inquiries, if they involve higher-profile individuals (including members of Congress) would ordinarily require approval from the higher levels of the DOJ, including the attorney general. However, in saying that they were unaware of the subpoenas, Sessions and Barr have opened up the possibility that someone else at the department may have approved them illegally, which would make that person (or persons) subject to criminal prosecution for their actions.
Beyond the seizure of lawmakers’ phone data for an investigation into the leaks, it has been revealed that Trump’s DOJ also subpoenaed the phone records of several members of the media in 2020, including reporters from The Washington Post, The New York Times and CNN.
Not everyone is buying into the claims by Sessions and Barr that they did not know about these actions by the Justice Department. After details of the subpoenas were first made public, Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi (D-California) expressed skepticism over the denials issued by the former attorneys general.
“To say that they didn’t know anything about it is beyond belief,” Pelosi said in an interview. “We will have to have them come under oath to testify about that.”
“How could it be that there could be an investigation of members in the other branch of government and the press and the rest too and the attorneys general did not know?” Pelosi added.
Truthout Is Preparing to Meet Trump’s Agenda With Resistance at Every Turn
Dear Truthout Community,
If you feel rage, despondency, confusion and deep fear today, you are not alone. We’re feeling it too. We are heartsick. Facing down Trump’s fascist agenda, we are desperately worried about the most vulnerable people among us, including our loved ones and everyone in the Truthout community, and our minds are racing a million miles a minute to try to map out all that needs to be done.
We must give ourselves space to grieve and feel our fear, feel our rage, and keep in the forefront of our mind the stark truth that millions of real human lives are on the line. And simultaneously, we’ve got to get to work, take stock of our resources, and prepare to throw ourselves full force into the movement.
Journalism is a linchpin of that movement. Even as we are reeling, we’re summoning up all the energy we can to face down what’s coming, because we know that one of the sharpest weapons against fascism is publishing the truth.
There are many terrifying planks to the Trump agenda, and we plan to devote ourselves to reporting thoroughly on each one and, crucially, covering the movements resisting them. We also recognize that Trump is a dire threat to journalism itself, and that we must take this seriously from the outset.
Last week, the four of us sat down to have some hard but necessary conversations about Truthout under a Trump presidency. How would we defend our publication from an avalanche of far right lawsuits that seek to bankrupt us? How would we keep our reporters safe if they need to cover outbreaks of political violence, or if they are targeted by authorities? How will we urgently produce the practical analysis, tools and movement coverage that you need right now — breaking through our normal routines to meet a terrifying moment in ways that best serve you?
It will be a tough, scary four years to produce social justice-driven journalism. We need to deliver news, strategy, liberatory ideas, tools and movement-sparking solutions with a force that we never have had to before. And at the same time, we desperately need to protect our ability to do so.
We know this is such a painful moment and donations may understandably be the last thing on your mind. But we must ask for your support, which is needed in a new and urgent way.
We promise we will kick into an even higher gear to give you truthful news that cuts against the disinformation and vitriol and hate and violence. We promise to publish analyses that will serve the needs of the movements we all rely on to survive the next four years, and even build for the future. We promise to be responsive, to recognize you as members of our community with a vital stake and voice in this work.
Please dig deep if you can, but a donation of any amount will be a truly meaningful and tangible action in this cataclysmic historical moment. We are presently looking for 253 new monthly donors in the next 3 days.
We’re with you. Let’s do all we can to move forward together.
With love, rage, and solidarity,
Maya, Negin, Saima, and Ziggy