The House Financial Services and Intelligence Committees have subpoenaed Deutsche Bank, which has long provided loans to President Donald Trump despite “a long history of defaults and bankruptcies,” according to The New York Times.
During the course of his business career, Trump has reportedly received more than $2 billion in loans from Deutsche Bank. As the president took office, he had more than $300 million in outstanding loans from the financial institution, which was his largest creditor.
Recent congressional testimony by Michael Cohen, in which the president’s former personal attorney and “fixer” raised allegations of possible financial crimes committed by Trump, has brought the president’s finances under renewed scrutiny. Experts have placed particular focus on Cohen’s statements about how the president allegedly exaggerates the extent of his wealth.
“The two committees that issued the subpoena . . . also demanded documents from numerous other financial institutions, including JPMorgan Chase, Bank of America and Citigroup, related to possible money-laundering by people in Russia and Eastern Europe,” the Times reported.
“The potential use of the U.S. financial system for illicit purposes is a very serious concern,” House Financial Services Chairwoman Maxine Waters, D-Calif., said in a statement. She explained that her committee was “exploring these matters, including as they may involve the president and his associates, as thoroughly as possible pursuant to its oversight authority, and will follow the facts wherever they may lead us.”
Waters was even more scathing at a public hearing last week when speaking to the chief executives of several big banks about their business dealings with Russia.
“Much has been reported about how Deutsche Bank has been a pathway for criminals, kleptocrats and allies of Mr. Putin to move illicit funds out of Russia. But recent information shows that some of your institutions have also been providing services for Russian individuals or entities that may be engaging in questionable transactions,” Waters told the banking executives at the hearing.
Kerrie McHugh, a spokesperson for Deutsche Bank, responded to media reports about the subpoenas by saying that the company was “engaged in a productive dialogue,” and it would “remain committed to providing appropriate information to all authorized investigations in a manner consistent with our legal obligations.”
By contrast, the Trump Organization’s lawyer Alan Garten told reporters that the company was mulling how the company could possibly stop Deutsche Bank from observing the House Democrats’ subpoena.
“This subpoena is an unprecedented abuse of power and simply the latest attempt by House Democrats to attack the president and our family for political gain,” Eric Trump explained in a statement. The president’s youngest son, who partially runs his business empire, also argued that the subpoenas “set a horrible precedent for all taxpayers.”
Deutsche Bank has been responsible for a number of Trump’s most high-profile loans, including renovations of his Art Deco tower at 40 Wall Street, an East Side skyscraper, a skyscraper in Chicago, a Trump Marina casino in Atlantic City and an effort to buy the General Motors building in Manhattan. As The New York Times reported last month:
Deutsche Bank officials have quietly argued to regulators, lawmakers and journalists that Mr. Trump was not a priority for the bank or its senior leaders and that the lending was the work of a single, obscure division. But interviews with more than 20 current and former Deutsche Bank executives and board members, most of them with direct knowledge of the Trump relationship, contradict the bank’s narrative.
We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.
As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.
Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.
As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.
At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.
Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.
You can help by giving today during our fundraiser. We have until midnight tonight to add 132 new monthly donors. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.