Skip to content Skip to footer

House Democrats in West Virginia Help Republicans Pass Anti-Trans Bill

This bill “would cause direct harm to the trans community in West Virginia,” one advocate said.

L.G.B.T. activists and their supporters rally in support of transgender people on the steps of New York City Hall.

West Virginia Democrats aligned with Republicans in the House of Delegates on Friday to pass a bill, HB 4233, that bars the term “nonbinary” from appearing on birth certificates and mandates the inclusion of a person’s sex (male/female) on the document.

While West Virginia already prohibited changing the gender marker on birth certificates to nonbinary, LGBTQ advocates condemned the Democrats who voted in favor of the bill, saying that their votes revealed where they stand on transgender rights.

“This isn’t even a thing -you can change birth certificates but NOT to non binary soooo the dems who will say it’s a do nothing bill- done DID something to their voter base,” West Virginian author and ACLU-WV staff member Jamie Miller said on social media. “It speaks volumes to the people in West Virginia that you disregard while voting for your own interests.”

The Democrats who voted for the bill include Hollis Lewis, Joey Garcia, Kayla Young, Ric Griffith, Sean Hornbuckle, and self-proclaimed “Lefty” Shawn Fluharty.

By approving this bill, Democrats not only disregard the identities of nonbinary and gender nonconforming West Virginians but also overlook the existence of intersex people within their state. According to the United Nations Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR), an estimated 1.7 percent of people are born with intersex traits or atypical sex characteristics.

Laws like this reinforce the dangerous yet prevalent practice of forcing intersex children to undergo surgeries to alter their gonads, internal reproductive organs, and genitals to conform more closely to stereotypical male or female characteristics. These surgeries can cause psychological distress in children who grow up to identify as a gender different than the one their bodies were surgically altered to be more like.

“Critics, often liberal Democrats, may question why the nonbinary birth certificate ban draws condemnation when seemingly few people care about the issue. Perhaps these critics should consider that standing on the side of the oppressor sends a harmful message,” Morgantown City Council member Brian Butcher wrote on his blog in response to the vote. “Intersex individuals are born at roughly the same rate as red-haired individuals. By endorsing this bill you have just told every constituent who was born intersex or with intersex children that they simply do not exist in the eyes of the law.”

In one study on intersex people, 81 percent of participants had been subjected to surgeries due to their intersex status, 50 percent of whom developed psychological problems. Because of this, human rights organizations have denounced this practice, asserting that such procedures are medically unnecessary and pose the risk of causing lifelong suffering.

While the ACLU-WV opposed this bill, advocates criticized LGBTQ groups, including Fairness WV, that didn’t publicly track its progression.

“The ACLU of WV alongside LGBTQ+ activists and organizers made it clear [this bill] would cause direct harm to the trans community in West Virginia,” transgender activist Ash Orr said on social media. “Wild that there was silence from other major LGBTQ+ adjacent organizations in this state.”

West Virginia lawmakers have advanced an additional 25 anti-LGBTQ bills since the start of this year. In total, more than 400 anti-LGBTQ bills have been introduced in state legislatures across the country since January 1.

We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.

As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.

Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.

As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.

At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.

Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.

You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.