Skip to content Skip to footer

Ginni Thomas Raised Nearly $600,000 in Anonymous Funds for Right-Wing Group

The fundraising is a “shocking display of audacity by the spouse of a sitting Supreme Court justice,” one observer said.

Virginia "Ginni" Thomas, wife of Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas, walks during a break as she speaks behind closed doors with investigators on the Jan. 6 Select Committee in the Thomas P. O'Neill Jr. House Office Building on Capitol Hill on September 29, 2022, in Washington, D.C.

A group once led by far right activist Ginni Thomas, spouse of Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas, received nearly $600,000 in anonymous donations to oppose progressive cultural causes, a new report from The Washington Post details.

From 2019 until the start of 2022, fledgling right-wing group Crowdsourcing for Culture and Liberty received funds through a “fiscal sponsorship” — an arrangement that allowed it to raise money without having to disclose where it came from, according to the Post’s report. This ensured that donors could remain hidden while the group advocated against what it described as “cultural Marxism.”

Under Thomas’s direction, fundraising dollars were funneled through Capital Research Center (CRC), a right-wing think tank aligned with Crowdsourcers’s work. Around $400,000 of the $596,000 that CRC received on behalf of Crowdsourcers also went through a different group, Donors Trust, which has a history of collecting money from wealthy conservative donors seeking to avoid disclosing their identities.

Donors Trust, for example, has spent millions of dollars funding groups that have propagated false claims about election fraud. It has also funded advocacy for voting laws that would disenfranchise members of marginalized communities.

Thomas, who no longer works for Crowdsourcers, appealed to donors by calling for right-wing “warriors” against what she claimed was a plot by the left to “[erode] the pillars of our country.”

“Conservatives and Republicans are tired of being the oppressed minority,” Thomas said in one fundraising video uncovered by The Post.

The groups used to funnel the anonymous funds to Crowdsourcing for Culture and Liberty have played a major role in attempting to influence the federal judicial branch, observers have noted. Although a lawyer for Thomas told The Post there was “no plausible conflict of interest issue” with respect to her husband’s work, many have voiced skepticism over that assertion.

“Donors Trust was central to the far-right Court-packing operation, and now they pass secret donor funds to a justice’s spouse, but ‘no plausible conflict of interest’? Please,” Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse (D-Rhode Island) wrote on Twitter.

“Yet another shocking display of audacity by the spouse of a sitting Supreme Court justice that raises brand-new questions about ethics and potential conflicts of interest,” MSNBC host Nicolle Wallace said in response to the report. Ginni Thomas’s work in far right circles is “exactly why the public doesn’t trust” the institution of the Supreme Court, she added.

Indeed, although both Thomases insist they do not discuss their work at home, there is reason to doubt these claims. When the Supreme Court was charged with deciding whether communications from former Trump administration chief of staff Mark Meadows — which likely included texts from Ginni Thomas encouraging Meadows to overturn the 2020 presidential election — should be turned over to the January 6 commission, eight justices agreed that the material should be handed to the committee. Clarence Thomas was the lone dissenting justice.

Though the Court’s ethical guidelines encourage justices to recuse themselves “in any proceeding in which his [or her] impartiality might reasonably be questioned,” Clarence Thomas has never recused himself from a case that has involved his wife’s work.

Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW) called for the House Judiciary Committee to investigate potential conflicts of interest between the two late last year. “The Judiciary Committees have responsibility for the oversight of our judiciary and law enforcement agencies, and investigating Ginni Thomas’s conduct and Justice Thomas’s failure to recuse is an essential exercise of that oversight responsibility,” the organization’s president, Noah Bookbinder, said in October.

We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.

As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.

Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.

As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.

At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.

Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.

You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.