Skip to content Skip to footer

Georgia’s Racist Citizen’s Arrest Law Moves Closer to Repeal

The bill received near-unanimous backing, with the state House voting 169-0 and the Senate voting 51-1 in its favor.

Demonstrators gather at the Glynn County courthouse during a court appearance by Gregory and Travis McMichael, two suspects in the fatal shooting of Ahmaud Arbery, on June 4, 2020, in Brunswick, Georgia.

Lawmakers in Georgia overwhelmingly passed new legislation that will repeal the state’s provision on citizen’s arrests, a move that came in response to public outcry over the 2020 killing of Ahmaud Arbery, a 25-year-old Black man who was shot and murdered while jogging by two white men in Georgia.

The bill passed the House by a unanimous 169-0 vote on Wednesday. Earlier this week, the Senate also approved the measure, voting 51-1 to advance it.

Gov. Brian Kemp has signaled his strong support of the bill. “I look forward to signing it into law as we continue to send a clear message that the Peach State will not tolerate sinister acts of vigilantism in our communities,” he said.

While repealing major aspects of the citizen’s arrest provision in state code, the bill leaves intact a number of ways that individuals can still detain another person under suspicion of having committed a crime, private businesses or on an individual’s personal property. Security officers, private investigators, and truck scale inspectors are also permitted to detain individuals under the new proposal.

Still, the bill states that “private actors who do not do what the law requires can be held responsible for false imprisonment” and be “civilly liable” for their actions, A Just Georgia, a nonprofit organization that bills itself as “a coalition of organizations, organizers, and lawyers, working to transform the conditions of criminalization and racialized violence,” tweeted on Wednesday.

The advancement of the bill came about in response to the 2020 killing of Ahmaud Arbery, a 25-year-old Black man who was shot and murdered near Brunswick, Georgia, while jogging. Gregory McMichael, a retired law enforcement officer, along with his son, Travis McMichael, chased Arbery down in their truck as he was out on his run.

After Travis McMichael exited the vehicle, he confronted Arbery, then shot and killed him. Both white men tried to justify chasing and shooting Arbery by saying he resembled someone who was suspected of home invasions in the area at the time. Gregory McMichael also claimed that Arbery had “violently” attacked his son, but the release of video of the killing demonstrated that did not happen.

In the months between February, when Arbery was killed, and May, when the video was published online, prosecutors in Georgia had refused to take any legal action against the McMichaels, justifying their refusal to do so on the state’s citizen’s arrest law. Following the release of the video, public outcry led to both men being charged in Arbery’s murder.

Many citizen’s arrest laws have racist histories. Georgia’s version of the law, originally passed in 1863, was intended to allow white slavers to capture Black individuals attempting to escape enslavement to join the Union Army during the Civil War. In the early 1900s, the law was also used to facilitate the lynchings and killings of Black people at the hands of white residents.

A number of organizations have celebrated the bill’s advancement. When an earlier version had passed last month, the Southern Center for Human Rights (SCHR) lauded the moves to end the outdated and racist law.

The citizen’s arrest statute was “an unnecessary law that has been used for more than 150 years to justify anti-Black violence,” Marissa Dodson, SCHR’s public policy director, said at the time.

The SCHR also tweeted in support of the more recent passage of the bill this week, but noted that the Republican-led state legislature had also recently passed a number of other oppressive bills.

Those bills, which include the expansion of mandatory cash bail and limits on local governments to reduce their police budgets, “will further harm communities most impacted by the failures of our criminal legal systems,” the organization said.

Truthout Is Preparing to Meet Trump’s Agenda With Resistance at Every Turn

Dear Truthout Community,

If you feel rage, despondency, confusion and deep fear today, you are not alone. We’re feeling it too. We are heartsick. Facing down Trump’s fascist agenda, we are desperately worried about the most vulnerable people among us, including our loved ones and everyone in the Truthout community, and our minds are racing a million miles a minute to try to map out all that needs to be done.

We must give ourselves space to grieve and feel our fear, feel our rage, and keep in the forefront of our mind the stark truth that millions of real human lives are on the line. And simultaneously, we’ve got to get to work, take stock of our resources, and prepare to throw ourselves full force into the movement.

Journalism is a linchpin of that movement. Even as we are reeling, we’re summoning up all the energy we can to face down what’s coming, because we know that one of the sharpest weapons against fascism is publishing the truth.

There are many terrifying planks to the Trump agenda, and we plan to devote ourselves to reporting thoroughly on each one and, crucially, covering the movements resisting them. We also recognize that Trump is a dire threat to journalism itself, and that we must take this seriously from the outset.

After the election, the four of us sat down to have some hard but necessary conversations about Truthout under a Trump presidency. How would we defend our publication from an avalanche of far right lawsuits that seek to bankrupt us? How would we keep our reporters safe if they need to cover outbreaks of political violence, or if they are targeted by authorities? How will we urgently produce the practical analysis, tools and movement coverage that you need right now — breaking through our normal routines to meet a terrifying moment in ways that best serve you?

It will be a tough, scary four years to produce social justice-driven journalism. We need to deliver news, strategy, liberatory ideas, tools and movement-sparking solutions with a force that we never have had to before. And at the same time, we desperately need to protect our ability to do so.

We know this is such a painful moment and donations may understandably be the last thing on your mind. But we must ask for your support, which is needed in a new and urgent way.

We promise we will kick into an even higher gear to give you truthful news that cuts against the disinformation and vitriol and hate and violence. We promise to publish analyses that will serve the needs of the movements we all rely on to survive the next four years, and even build for the future. We promise to be responsive, to recognize you as members of our community with a vital stake and voice in this work.

Please dig deep if you can, but a donation of any amount will be a truly meaningful and tangible action in this cataclysmic historical moment.

We’re with you. Let’s do all we can to move forward together.

With love, rage, and solidarity,

Maya, Negin, Saima, and Ziggy