Vice President Kamala Harris has sparked fury after saying that she would not break from President Joe Biden’s policies toward Israel and its U.S.-sponsored genocide of Palestinians in Gaza if she were elected president this fall.
In an interview with CNN on Thursday, Harris said she would not stop sending Israel weapons and that Israel “has a right to defend itself” — after it has killed tens of thousands of civilians, including over 16,000 children, and as UN experts point out that the International Court of Justice has ruled that Israel cannot invoke that line of argument as an occupying force.
”Let me be very clear. I’m unequivocal and unwavering in my commitment to Israel’s defense and its ability to defend itself. And that’s not gonna change,” Harris said when asked if she would do anything differently than Biden if elected.
She then parroted the Biden administration’s call for a ceasefire despite it being clear that Biden’s policy of backing Israel at every turn is totally ineffective at pressuring Israel into accepting a ceasefire deal — and, in fact, is likely actively hampering the chances of a deal.
“Far too many innocent Palestinians have been killed. And we have got to get a [ceasefire] deal done,” she said. “We must get a deal that is about getting the hostages out. I’ve met with the families of the American hostages. Let’s get the hostages out. Let’s get the ceasefire done.”
When asked point blank about whether she’d change Biden’s policy of providing Israel with a bottomless well of weapons, Harris said: “No…. I remain committed, since I’ve been on October 8, to what we must do to work toward a two-state solution where Israel is secure and in equal measure the Palestinians have security and self-determination and dignity.”
Tellingly, by keeping her policy ideals focused around a ceasefire, Harris suggests a ceasefire deal wouldn’t be struck before she took office in five months — despite the Biden administration’s insistence for months that negotiators are close to striking a deal.
It also suggests that the administration is not focused on what would happen on the “day after” Israel stopped its genocide, but is rather focused on repeating empty platitudes about a two-state solution that Israeli officials are openly opposed to.
Israeli officials announced this week that the U.S. has sent Israel over 600 weapons shipments, carrying over 50,000 tons of military equipment, since October, amounting to nearly two shipments or over 150 tons of equipment per day. Israel has used these weapons to slaughter Palestinians across Gaza in what experts have said are likely war crimes that should theoretically trigger the U.S. to pare back its weapons shipments under U.S. law.
In terms of the election, Harris has little reason not to conduct a pivot. Biden’s approval rating plummeted in the first months of the genocide, with pollsters citing his Israel policy as a major reason for the decline. His Gaza policies are extremely unpopular among the public, and especially among key demographics that Harris must woo if she hopes to triumph over Donald Trump in November; a recent poll found that Harris could earn a boost to her support in key swing states if she called for an end to weapons transfers to Israel.
Harris’s insistence, instead, that she maintain the Biden administration’s policy sparked fury among advocates for Palestinian rights.
“That’s right,” Rep. Rashida Tlaib (D-Michigan) said on social media in response to a post by Zeteo reporter Prem Thakker pointing out that Harris’s response means she would be ignoring international and domestic humanitarian law in order to send Israel weapons.
“War crimes and genocide will continue,” Tlaib said.
We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.
As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.
Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.
As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.
At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.
Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.
You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.