The U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia has refused to hear former President Donald Trump’s en banc appeal of an earlier appellate court ruling regarding a gag order that has been imposed on him in the case involving his attempts to overturn the 2020 presidential election.
En banc proceedings involve an entire circuit appeals court reviewing a prior three-judge ruling from within its ranks. Last month, Trump lost an appeal to such a three-judge court within the D.C. Court of Appeals after judges found that a gag order was properly placed on him by Judge Tanya Chutkan, the federal judge overseeing his election subversion case.
In a short order from the full en banc appeal, the language used by the judges indicated that none of the 11 members of the district court deemed Trump’s First Amendment speech claims credible enough to warrant lifting the gag order.
“Upon consideration of appellant’s petition for rehearing en banc, the response thereto, and the absence of a request by any member of the court for a vote, it is ordered that the petition be denied,” the order issued on Tuesday reads.
Chutkan’s original gag order was made in October to limit Trump’s ability to make statements intimidating prosecutors, court officials, court employees and named or potential witnesses in the case, either on social media or during in-person statements. Trump appealed, and in November a three-judge panel agreed with Chutkan’s reasoning, making special note of the fact that Trump’s history indicated that he couldn’t be trusted to adjust his behavior on his own.
“Why does the district court have to wait and see, and wait for the threats to come, rather than taking a reasonable action in advance?” Judge Brad Garcia, one of the members of that three-judge panel, asked at the time.
The appeals court was unanimous in its decision to keep Chutkan’s order in place.
“Mr. Trump’s documented pattern of speech and its demonstrated real-time, real-world consequences pose a significant and imminent threat to the functioning of the criminal trial process in this case,” the order from last month read.
Following the en banc order, Trump’s only recourse to get the gag order lifted is to appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court. Trump perhaps has better odds to win on appeal at the nation’s highest court due to its 6-3 conservative majority; three of the justices in that conservative bloc are Trump appointees, with a fourth member of the bench, Justice Clarence Thomas, repeatedly indicating his fealty to the former president.
But the Supreme Court, even with this majority, has dismissed Trump’s assertions in the past, including in the other federal case he’s facing involving his improper retention of classified materials after leaving office. In short, a favorable ruling from the Court is not necessarily a given.
The Court’s ruling could indicate how justices will eventually rule in the election subversion case — and whether the Supreme Court will be sympathetic to Trump in future appeals.
Truthout Is Preparing to Meet Trump’s Agenda With Resistance at Every Turn
Dear Truthout Community,
If you feel rage, despondency, confusion and deep fear today, you are not alone. We’re feeling it too. We are heartsick. Facing down Trump’s fascist agenda, we are desperately worried about the most vulnerable people among us, including our loved ones and everyone in the Truthout community, and our minds are racing a million miles a minute to try to map out all that needs to be done.
We must give ourselves space to grieve and feel our fear, feel our rage, and keep in the forefront of our mind the stark truth that millions of real human lives are on the line. And simultaneously, we’ve got to get to work, take stock of our resources, and prepare to throw ourselves full force into the movement.
Journalism is a linchpin of that movement. Even as we are reeling, we’re summoning up all the energy we can to face down what’s coming, because we know that one of the sharpest weapons against fascism is publishing the truth.
There are many terrifying planks to the Trump agenda, and we plan to devote ourselves to reporting thoroughly on each one and, crucially, covering the movements resisting them. We also recognize that Trump is a dire threat to journalism itself, and that we must take this seriously from the outset.
After the election, the four of us sat down to have some hard but necessary conversations about Truthout under a Trump presidency. How would we defend our publication from an avalanche of far right lawsuits that seek to bankrupt us? How would we keep our reporters safe if they need to cover outbreaks of political violence, or if they are targeted by authorities? How will we urgently produce the practical analysis, tools and movement coverage that you need right now — breaking through our normal routines to meet a terrifying moment in ways that best serve you?
It will be a tough, scary four years to produce social justice-driven journalism. We need to deliver news, strategy, liberatory ideas, tools and movement-sparking solutions with a force that we never have had to before. And at the same time, we desperately need to protect our ability to do so.
We know this is such a painful moment and donations may understandably be the last thing on your mind. But we must ask for your support, which is needed in a new and urgent way.
We promise we will kick into an even higher gear to give you truthful news that cuts against the disinformation and vitriol and hate and violence. We promise to publish analyses that will serve the needs of the movements we all rely on to survive the next four years, and even build for the future. We promise to be responsive, to recognize you as members of our community with a vital stake and voice in this work.
Please dig deep if you can, but a donation of any amount will be a truly meaningful and tangible action in this cataclysmic historical moment.
We’re with you. Let’s do all we can to move forward together.
With love, rage, and solidarity,
Maya, Negin, Saima, and Ziggy