A judge overseeing a defamation trial against Fox News announced on Tuesday that the trial would not be going forward, as the network and the company suing them, Dominion Voting Systems, had reached a settlement agreement.
Dominion had alleged that the cable news network had spread false and damaging claims about the company in the months after the 2020 presidential election, pointing to statements by program guests who wrongly asserted that Dominion voting machines used in the election switched votes from former President Donald Trump to President Joe Biden. Fox News hosts repeatedly allowed these false claims to go unchallenged, the company said.
Dominion had requested $1.6 billion in the lawsuit. On Tuesday, the company announced that it had agreed to a sum of $787.5 million from the network.
The settlement will allow Fox News to avoid a jury trial in which several of its personalities would have likely had to testify about the disinformation that was propagated by the network. Dominion had planned to call Rupert Murdoch, CEO of News Corp (Fox’s parent company) to the stand, as well as his son Lachlan Murdoch. They had also planned to have Fox News personalities Tucker Carlson and Sean Hannity testify, both of whom knowingly spread lies about the 2020 election.
“We are pleased to have reached a settlement of our dispute with Dominion Voting Systems. We acknowledge the Court’s rulings finding certain claims about Dominion to be false,” Fox News said in a statement about the settlement.
Dominion officials asserted that the settlement was an acknowledgment of wrongdoing by Fox News.
“Fox has admitted to telling lies about Dominion that caused enormous damage to my company, our employees, and the customers that we serve. … The evidence brought to light through this case underscores the consequences of spreading lies,” Dominion CEO John Poulos said.
Notably, the settlement doesn’t appear to require Fox News to acknowledge its wrongdoing to viewers directly. Many legal experts on social media had hoped for any settlement to require such an action, and Dominion reportedly had been pursuing it as a stipulation of any agreement.
“There’s no doubt that the $787.5 million settlement is an emphatic win for Dominion. I can’t help but think, though, about the significance to Fox of not having to acknowledge, on air, that the network spread falsehoods,” Jonathan Peters, a media law professor at the University of Georgia, said on Twitter.
“Fox gets to duck *full* responsibility and avoid a head-on reckoning with its viewers. And, instead, we get a mealy-mouthed written statement” from the network, Peters went on, adding that a “clear on-air acknowledgment would have served the public interest and public record.”
“It’s hard to see how this result — without real public accountability — changes Fox’s behavior,” ProPublica’s Andy Kroll wrote on Twitter. “Without an on-air retraction, correction, or apology, some Fox viewers probably don’t know the settlement happened!”
There is still the possibility that the network will be required to make such a statement in a separate lawsuit, however. Smartmatic, another voting machine company that Fox News guests wrongly claimed had engaged in voter fraud, is currently suing the network for $2.7 billion.
A lawyer for the company indicated that the lawsuit would bring to light additional information about lies that were spread on the network. “Dominion’s litigation exposed some of the misconduct and damage caused by Fox’s disinformation campaign. Smartmatic will expose the rest,” Smartmatic lawyer Erik Connolly said.
We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.
As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.
Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.
As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.
At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.
Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.
You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.