Skip to content Skip to footer

Formerly Incarcerated People Face “Forever Punishment” in Collateral Sanctions

Collateral sanctions enable the power structure to penalize those it deems “unworthy” and “undesirable.”

Incarcerated people walk outside the Texas Department of Criminal Justice's Hightower Unit on July 16, 2014, in Dayton, Texas.

On May 19, Building Freedom Ohio (BFO), a division of the Ohio Organizing Collaborative, will host a convening of formerly incarcerated persons in Cleveland focused on building political power and educating directly impacted individuals about political, legislative and voting strategies.

As a returning citizen and BFO fellow, I’ll be attending the gathering with a sense of urgency. I’m participating because I want shine a light on “collateral sanctions,” which are policies and practices that perpetually punish persons who have been arrested, convicted or incarcerated as a result of felony charges by eliminating many of their basic civil rights.

Once a person has been convicted of a crime, even if we survive incarceration, we experience a civil death of sorts; we are not treated as regular citizens. We’re excluded from basic rights and privileges — all after having already served our sentence. If you have a loved one who is a formerly incarcerated person, you likely know what it’s like to sit with them after they have received rejection upon rejection for an apartment, a job, grants or loans for school, or anything else that matters in life.

The bottom line is that the issue of collateral sanctions (also called collateral consequences) must be brought to the forefront. In 2018, there were nearly 1,100 collateral consequences expressed through policy in Ohio, according to Policy Matters Ohio, including everything from limitations on where a person can live and work, to what resources they can access. For instance, some apartment complexes bar persons with felony convictions from living on their premises. In fact, most people with felony convictions can recount horror stories of trying to obtain housing. They also include restrictions on the types of supports — such as public benefits, government-sponsored student loans and grants, or health care — that a previously nonconvicted person may access.

Collateral sanctions are relics of slavery. In the same way that the U.S. Constitution permits slavery as a punishment for crime, collateral sanctions enable the power structure to penalize those it deems “unworthy” and “undesirable.”

They also include restrictions on employment or certain types of occupational licenses, including those for electrical contractors, HVAC contractors and solicitors. Most shockingly and equally devastating, collateral sanctions also include ineligibility to provide foster care to minor family members. Would our elected leaders really prefer a child not know love than receive it from a rehabilitated and safe caregiver who has been impacted by the prison system?

It’s important to note that this form of perpetual punishment isn’t actually about safety. Preventing people from finding housing or a good job actually makes communities less safe.

As a consequence of collateral sanctions, I’ve faced one post-release hurdle after another. Because I have a conviction on my record, I will never be looked at the same again by some people. Although I obtained a bachelor’s degree in business administration, most people look at me and see felony conviction, but I am so much more.

The irony is that in permitting collateral sanctions, local and state jurisdictions harm us all. As a result of collateral sanctions, individuals with criminal records are barred from being fully integrated back into the community, businesses experience a smaller pool of workers, and talented and capable individuals are unable to bring their full selves to work or to the community.

My hope in attending BFO’s May 19 event is to raise awareness and inspire elected leaders to take action to end collateral sanctions once and for all. I want to see officials acknowledge the pain of “forever punishment.” I want them to be inspired to remove these barriers that keep people like me from being reintegrated back into society.

We are gaining national momentum in the fight against collateral sanctions. For example, New Jersey passed the Fair Chance in Housing Act in 2021, which prevents housing providers from discriminating against formerly incarcerated individuals. A similar law is being considered in Michigan. And in my home state of Ohio, Republican legislators recently introduced the GROW Act, which will make it easier for some returning citizens like me to get jobs, reintegrate and rehabilitate ourselves by automatically sealing certain criminal records. However, the proposed law as it is currently written leaves out huge swaths of criminalized people. Because it may be difficult to push for another bill after this one, it’s essential that we get it right the first time.

I know the pain that I live with on a day-to-day basis. But nearly 1 million persons in Ohio with felony convictions are also potential victims of collateral sanctions. We need help. We want to move forward, but we need society’s help to do so.

We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.

As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.

Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.

As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.

At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.

Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.

You can help by giving today during our fundraiser. We have 8 days to add 460 new monthly donors. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.