Skip to content Skip to footer

People With Criminal Records Should Not Have to Hire a Lawyer Just to Get a Job

State laws are restricting people with convictions from working as nurses, counselors and janitors.

Everly James, who was formerly incarcerated and does odd jobs for money as he tries to find work, works on the air conditioning system of Lindsey Turner's car on June 23, 2011, in Houston, Texas.

Finding work can be difficult for anyone, but Fernando Herrera faces an extra challenge. California has banned him for life from his dream job as a firefighter because of two felonies he committed as a teenager.

Herrera went to prison for assaults he committed at ages 14 and 15. But he took responsibility for his actions and turned his life around. He worked as an unpaid firefighter while in prison and found his passion. After his release, he served as a volunteer firefighter and helped put out the 2018 Camp Fire, which was the deadliest fire in California history. But despite becoming an outstanding citizen, California law prevents Herrera from obtaining EMT certification, without which he cannot become a paid firefighter. This is solely because of his criminal record.

Millions of job applicants face similar barriers nationwide. All 50 states and Washington, D.C. restrict people with convictions from obtaining a license to work. Many of these restrictions are arbitrary and unnecessary. Want to cut hair or paint nails for a living? Many states will not give you a license unless you pass a background check. Want to drive a commercial vehicle? Same drill.

Pennsylvania regulators denied Courtney Haveman a license to be a skin care specialist because of two DUIs, even though she had been sober for years and had an employer eager to hire her. Haveman sued the state with representation from our public interest law firm, the Institute for Justice, and won her case. But she should not have had to hire a lawyer just to work in a spa.

Worse yet, 30 states can deny a license to work if a person is arrested but never convicted. Single mom Ifrah Yassin learned this the hard way. Officers briefly arrested her on suspicion of robbery in 2013, but prosecutors declined to file charges after realizing she was innocent.

Despite the vindication, Minnesota regulators still tried to use the incident to stop Yassin from working in a group home for adults with intellectual disabilities 10 years later — at a desk job no less. Our law firm again intervened.

People should be able to leave their past behind them, but far too often the government will not let them. This is a problem for nearly one-third of the adult working-age population, which has a criminal record. Over 60 percent of people leaving prison are unemployed a year later, seeking work but not finding it.

Some state lawmakers are trying to change this. But rather than look inward at their own state licensing laws, they shift the blame onto employers who hesitate to hire people with criminal backgrounds. Most recently, New York Gov. Kathy Hochul signed the Clean Slate Act on November 16, 2023, which creates a path for returning citizens to have their records expunged. The premise is simple: If employers cannot see convictions, then applicants who served time are more likely to get hired. Overall, 12 states have passed legislation like this in the past five years.

The approach has merit but overlooks the other half of the equation. Many employers are eager to hire returning citizens but cannot because of bad state laws. New York’s Clean Slate Act does nothing to change this. The law still allows government regulators to view expunged records to determine “suitability for licensing.”

Some jobs are hit harder than others. Health care careers are almost entirely unavailable for people with criminal records. A single drug conviction — tainted by judicial misconduct — upended Erma Wilson’s dream of becoming a registered nurse in Texas. Colorado goes further, placing restrictions on all jobs at behavioral health institutions. People with criminal histories cannot mop floors or serve cafeteria food in these facilities in Colorado.

Tennessee and Virginia target addiction recovery counselors. Role models with personal experience getting sober need not apply if previous substance abuse led to a conviction. Rudy Carey hit this wall in Virginia. The state tried to block his counseling career because of a single assault conviction in 2004.

One workaround for people with criminal records is self-employment. Yet regulators still have ways to interfere. The Federal Communications Commission tried to stop Joe Armstrong from operating a radio station in Tennessee. And the U.S. Department of Agriculture tried to stop Mark Wilks from joining the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) as a retail partner at his neighborhood stores in Maryland.

Until states pass meaningful reform, litigation is the only answer for many applicants. After Haveman sued Pennsylvania, her case prompted new legislation. Now, licensing boards cannot deny applications based on someone’s criminal history unless convictions are “directly related” to the occupation. Boards also must show evidence that granting the application would pose a “substantial risk” to the public.

Herrera was not so lucky in California. He went to court in 2020 to challenge his lifetime ban on being a firefighter and lost. California still has not fixed its laws.

Changes are long overdue. People should not have to hire a lawyer just to get a job. New York’s Clean Slate Act is one approach to reform. But eliminating unnecessary licensing laws is a better one.

Many states are making progress. South Carolina passed a law in 2023 that eliminates vague terms like “good moral character” and “moral turpitude” to deny licenses. Illinois, Missouri and Oklahoma have also passed licensing reforms in recent years, and Colorado has a bill advancing in 2024.

These are all steps in the right direction. People make mistakes, but they deserve a chance for a fresh start.

Truthout Is Preparing to Meet Trump’s Agenda With Resistance at Every Turn

Dear Truthout Community,

If you feel rage, despondency, confusion and deep fear today, you are not alone. We’re feeling it too. We are heartsick. Facing down Trump’s fascist agenda, we are desperately worried about the most vulnerable people among us, including our loved ones and everyone in the Truthout community, and our minds are racing a million miles a minute to try to map out all that needs to be done.

We must give ourselves space to grieve and feel our fear, feel our rage, and keep in the forefront of our mind the stark truth that millions of real human lives are on the line. And simultaneously, we’ve got to get to work, take stock of our resources, and prepare to throw ourselves full force into the movement.

Journalism is a linchpin of that movement. Even as we are reeling, we’re summoning up all the energy we can to face down what’s coming, because we know that one of the sharpest weapons against fascism is publishing the truth.

There are many terrifying planks to the Trump agenda, and we plan to devote ourselves to reporting thoroughly on each one and, crucially, covering the movements resisting them. We also recognize that Trump is a dire threat to journalism itself, and that we must take this seriously from the outset.

After the election, the four of us sat down to have some hard but necessary conversations about Truthout under a Trump presidency. How would we defend our publication from an avalanche of far right lawsuits that seek to bankrupt us? How would we keep our reporters safe if they need to cover outbreaks of political violence, or if they are targeted by authorities? How will we urgently produce the practical analysis, tools and movement coverage that you need right now — breaking through our normal routines to meet a terrifying moment in ways that best serve you?

It will be a tough, scary four years to produce social justice-driven journalism. We need to deliver news, strategy, liberatory ideas, tools and movement-sparking solutions with a force that we never have had to before. And at the same time, we desperately need to protect our ability to do so.

We know this is such a painful moment and donations may understandably be the last thing on your mind. But we must ask for your support, which is needed in a new and urgent way.

We promise we will kick into an even higher gear to give you truthful news that cuts against the disinformation and vitriol and hate and violence. We promise to publish analyses that will serve the needs of the movements we all rely on to survive the next four years, and even build for the future. We promise to be responsive, to recognize you as members of our community with a vital stake and voice in this work.

Please dig deep if you can, but a donation of any amount will be a truly meaningful and tangible action in this cataclysmic historical moment.

We’re with you. Let’s do all we can to move forward together.

With love, rage, and solidarity,

Maya, Negin, Saima, and Ziggy