Skip to content Skip to footer

Following General Strike, Argentine President’s Austerity Bill Withdrawn

The anti-worker and austerity measures in the bill included massive privatizations, layoffs and labor reforms.

People protest in front of Congress on the day of a general strike against the reform plans of President Javier Milei on January 24, 2024, in Buenos Aires, Argentina.

This week in Argentina, members of congress voted on the highly repressive Omnibus Bill proposed by far-right president Javier Milei. After a general strike and four days of massive mobilizations, the bill was withdrawn. It’s a huge victory for the working class and the movement in the streets.

The bill included a series of anti-worker and austerity measures, including massive privatizations, layoffs, and labor reforms. Much to the satisfaction of international capital — and the International Monetary Fund (IMF), which supported the reforms — the bill would have opened the country’s resources up to imperialist plunder. It was a pillar of Milei’s reactionary libertarian agenda.

The proposed law was profoundly unpopular, but rather than accept these attacks, workers, combative sectors of trade unions, social organizations, neighborhood assemblies, and the organized Left took to the streets. On January 24, 1.5 million people took part in a national strike. Mobilizations continued in the streets and in front of the congress despite heavy police repression. This powerful movement, organized from below, helped delegitimize the bill and was instrumental in its defeat.

In congress, politicians of the Workers Left Front (FIT), including Myriam Bregman, Romina del Pla, Alejandro Vilca, Christian Castillo, and Nicolás del Caño also helped.

The bill’s withdrawal shows a lack of agreement among the different wings of the capitalist class. While there was agreement on making the working class pay for Argentina’s growing economic and social crises, the various bourgeois parties had differences regarding the distribution of the national budget, and which sectors would benefit from the government’s polices. The workers’ movement exploited that gap inside and outside the congress.

This setback opens up a crisis for Milei and the government, which took power less than two months ago. It also poses a problem for the president who is enthusiastic to burnish his right-wing reputation abroad: He was visiting Israel at the time that the bill was withdrawn, and promising to move Argentina’s embassy to Jerusalem. But the three-day trip to the Zionist state was marred with an embarrassing defeat at home.

While the bill’s withdrawal was a victory for the working class, the fight against the reactionary regime, capitalism, and imperialist plunder continues in Argentina. And the government may yet re-introduce some aspects of its reactionary bill. In this sense, Tuesday’s victory is just the first battle against the reactionary Milei regime.

Nonetheless, the bill’s defeat stands as a powerful example of how the working class — in unions, universities, neighborhood assemblies, and in congress — can fight and defeat the Right. By harnessing the power of self-organized struggle and by refusing to compromise, the mass movement in Argentina won. To continue to fight back the Right and protect the rights of workers and the oppressed, the mass movement must keep organizing from below, refusing to put their faith in the union bureaucracies and “lesser evil” politicians, which attempt to rein in the mobilizations.

We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.

As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.

Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.

As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.

At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.

Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.

You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.