The Florida Board of Medicine recently fined an obstetrician and gynecologist $10,000 and issued a reprimand for violating a 2022 anti-abortion law requiring a 24-hour waiting period before performing abortions.
Florida’s 24-hour waiting period law, enacted in 2015, requires pregnant people to receive information about abortions from their doctor and then wait at least 24 hours before proceeding with the procedure. While Florida has contended that the law expanded upon existing informed-consent requirements, critics assert that mandatory waiting periods are medically unnecessary and interfere with pregnant people’s access to abortion.
“They are required for almost no other medical procedure, and they do not make abortion care safe,” reproductive health and rights organization the Guttmacher Institute has stated. “Instead, they aim to deter people from getting an abortion or to compel them to reconsider a decision that the vast majority are already certain of by the time they contact a clinic.”
Legal challenges delayed the law’s implementation until April 2022, sowing confusion and making it difficult for practitioners to navigate the state’s abortion care regulations.
Following the 2022 enactment of the law, the state’s Agency for Health Care Administration (AHCA) initiated a series of cases against clinics after reviewing records for compliance with the law. This included a case against the Center of Orlando for Women, where Dr. Candace Sue Cooley practiced. Cooley had performed 193 abortions at the Center of Orlando for Women during a two-week period in 2022, shortly after the waiting period law went into effect. In 2023, health regulators ordered the Center of Orlando for Women to pay a $193,000 fine for violating the 24-hour mandatory waiting period law, nearly three times the amount recommended by an administrative law judge.
The state’s medical regulatory board attempted to revoke Cooley’s medical license over the violation of the law, but Administrative Law Judge James H. Peterson III recommended a less severe penalty. In a recommended order, Peterson acknowledged that Cooley and the clinic had made reasonable efforts to confirm the law’s effective date but received no clear guidance from the AHCA.
“[T]he violation was unintentional and occurred despite reasonable efforts by the clinic and respondent (Cooley) to determine the effective date of the waiting period,” Peterson wrote. “Unlike the Department (of Health) and AHCA, neither respondent nor the clinic were parties to the litigation which occurred in Leon County, some 250 miles from the clinic. There was nothing readily accessible online about the final judgment having been issued on April 25, 2022.”
The judge also stated that no evidence showed patients suffered harm due to the lack of a 24-hour waiting period. “[T]he evidence indicates that no patients suffered physical harm as a result of respondent’s violation,” Peterson wrote. “[T]here was no evidence showing that any patients were harmed by not having a 24-hour delay in receiving their abortion.”
Florida’s 24-hour mandatory waiting period continues to create significant barriers to abortion access, particularly after the implementation of a six-week abortion ban and a telemedicine ban for abortion care.
We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.
As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.
Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.
As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.
At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.
Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.
You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.