Conservatives are assailing a rule on payday lending currently being formulated by the Obama administration as an attack on states’ rights.
Right-wing members of the House Financial Services Committee accused the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau of trying to “preempt” state law, in its impending regulatory initiative focusing on short-term loans.
Bureau Director Richard Cordray told the committee on Wednesday that a rule will be coming in the Spring, but that it wouldn’t be based on preemption. He said it will be focused on setting minimum standards that “seek to eliminate predatory practices that embroil many consumers in a debt trap.”
When the federal government “preempts” state law, it effectively means the statute can be ignored, as Rep. Brad Sherman (D-Calif.) noted in a back-and-forth with Rep. Mick Mulvaney (R-S.C.)
“To preempt means to prevent the state law from being effective,” Sherman said. “To supplement, you have to obey the state law and you have to obey the federal law.”
“If the federal law requires me to wear a belt, state law requires to me wear both suspenders, I will wear both,” he added.
That line of reasoning did not assuage Republicans — often hostile, when questioning Cordray. A number of Democrats, too, are fiercely critical of CFPB efforts to crackdown on loansharking.
In recent weeks, some of those Democratic lawmakers have been subject to intense criticism from the party’s rank-and-file. It came after Huffington Post published a story on the cosponsoring of anti-CFPB legislation by Democratic National Committee Chair Debbie Wasserman-Schultz (D-Fla.). The bill would allow states with regulatory regimes similar to that of Florida to be exempt from any CFPB payday lending rules.
The state’s framework was touted on Wednesday by Rep. Dennis Ross (R-Florida), the author of the aforementioned bill. Ross reacted angrily when Cordray refused to describe Florida law as a “gold standard.”
“There’s been analysis of the Florida model, and what it shows is that these loans are still being made at above a 300 percent rate of interest, and they’re being rolled over on an average of nine times for many consumers,” Cordroy said. The repeated roll-over is something Cordray and other payday lending rule supporters have described as a “debt trap.”
Ross’ proposal has significant support within the Florida Congressional delegation. Democratic co-sponsors beyond Wasserman-Schultz include Reps. Alcee Hastings and Patrick Murphy.
Murphy’s support is most notable because he is running for the Senate seat being vacated by now-failed presidential candidate Marco Rubio (R-Fla.) Despite President Obama’s numerous vows to protect the CFPB from legislative attacks, Murphy’s senatorial campaign was endorsed earlier this month by the White House.
A member of the House Financial Services Committee, Murphy did not show up on Wednesday to ask Cordray any questions.
Truthout Is Preparing to Meet Trump’s Agenda With Resistance at Every Turn
Dear Truthout Community,
If you feel rage, despondency, confusion and deep fear today, you are not alone. We’re feeling it too. We are heartsick. Facing down Trump’s fascist agenda, we are desperately worried about the most vulnerable people among us, including our loved ones and everyone in the Truthout community, and our minds are racing a million miles a minute to try to map out all that needs to be done.
We must give ourselves space to grieve and feel our fear, feel our rage, and keep in the forefront of our mind the stark truth that millions of real human lives are on the line. And simultaneously, we’ve got to get to work, take stock of our resources, and prepare to throw ourselves full force into the movement.
Journalism is a linchpin of that movement. Even as we are reeling, we’re summoning up all the energy we can to face down what’s coming, because we know that one of the sharpest weapons against fascism is publishing the truth.
There are many terrifying planks to the Trump agenda, and we plan to devote ourselves to reporting thoroughly on each one and, crucially, covering the movements resisting them. We also recognize that Trump is a dire threat to journalism itself, and that we must take this seriously from the outset.
After the election, the four of us sat down to have some hard but necessary conversations about Truthout under a Trump presidency. How would we defend our publication from an avalanche of far right lawsuits that seek to bankrupt us? How would we keep our reporters safe if they need to cover outbreaks of political violence, or if they are targeted by authorities? How will we urgently produce the practical analysis, tools and movement coverage that you need right now — breaking through our normal routines to meet a terrifying moment in ways that best serve you?
It will be a tough, scary four years to produce social justice-driven journalism. We need to deliver news, strategy, liberatory ideas, tools and movement-sparking solutions with a force that we never have had to before. And at the same time, we desperately need to protect our ability to do so.
We know this is such a painful moment and donations may understandably be the last thing on your mind. But we must ask for your support, which is needed in a new and urgent way.
We promise we will kick into an even higher gear to give you truthful news that cuts against the disinformation and vitriol and hate and violence. We promise to publish analyses that will serve the needs of the movements we all rely on to survive the next four years, and even build for the future. We promise to be responsive, to recognize you as members of our community with a vital stake and voice in this work.
Please dig deep if you can, but a donation of any amount will be a truly meaningful and tangible action in this cataclysmic historical moment.
We’re with you. Let’s do all we can to move forward together.
With love, rage, and solidarity,
Maya, Negin, Saima, and Ziggy