The Federal Election Commission is urging Congress to close a loophole in federal law that allows foreign corporations to finance ballot measures.
The Federal Election Campaign Act currently prohibits foreign nationals and corporations from making political donations and independent expenditures in connection to an election for federal, state or local office. But the ban does not apply to political spending on ballot measures, referenda or even recall elections where a candidate is not seeking office.
Earlier in December, the FEC unanimously approved more than a dozen legislative recommendations to federal lawmakers, including proposals to close the loophole and make it illegal to help foreign nationals circumvent the restrictions.
For years, government watchdog groups have stressed the need to limit foreign meddling in state and local ballot questions, but federal campaign finance regulators say their hands are tied.
In 2021, the FEC dismissed a complaint alleging that the Australian mining company Sandfire Resources violated federal campaign finance law when it spent nearly $288,000 to defeat a Montana ballot measure that would have made it easier for regulators to deny mining permits. The commission concluded that foreign campaign contributions in connection to ballot questions fell “outside the purview” of federal law.
In a statement explaining the commission’s decision in the case, then-Chair Shana Broussard, a Democrat, wrote: “Until Congress expands the (Federal Election Campaign) Act’s foreign national prohibition to encompass state and local ballot activities, which I urge it to do, the Commission is bound by the law as it currently stands.”
In the absence of federal restrictions, several states have enacted their own bans. Maine became the latest state to tackle the issue in November when voters there approved a state referendum prohibiting companies owned by foreign governments from spending money to influence ballot initiatives.
The move came after a U.S. subsidiary of Hydro-Québec — a utility company owned by the Canadian province — spent more than $22 million to fight a state referendum concerning the construction of a transmission line in 2020.
Congress is currently considering several bills addressing the FEC’s recommendations. Last month, the Committee on House Administration advanced bipartisan legislation sponsored by Reps. Brian Fitzpatrick (R-Pa.) and Jared Golden (D-Maine) to prohibit foreign nationals from spending on state and local ballot initiatives, referenda and recall elections.
In the Senate, the Select Intelligence Committee over the summer approved an intelligence appropriations bill introduced by Sen. Mark Warner (D-Va.) that includes similar provisions on foreign campaign contributions.
Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse (D-R.I.) and Rep. David Cicilline (D-R.I.) have also sponsored sweeping campaign finance reforms that include measures to restrict foreign money in ballot initiatives and prevent someone from establishing a shell company to conceal election contributions by foreign nationals.
But even if Congress acts on the recommendations, preventing the flow of foreign money into U.S. elections could present a problem without additional funding.
A November report by the agency’s inspector general found that identifying and regulating unlawful foreign campaign contributions “continues to pose a significant challenge to the FEC.” The report blamed dwindling resources and a mounting workload.
The number of transactions subject to FEC regulations has increased dramatically over the previous two decades. During the 2000 election cycle, the FEC oversaw nearly 2 million receipts and expenditures. That number exceeded 590 million during the 2022 midterm elections.
At the same time, the FEC is struggling to maintain staff. From 2010 to 2023, its total workforce shrank by 12% and its budget, when adjusted for inflation, declined by 11%.
Truthout Is Preparing to Meet Trump’s Agenda With Resistance at Every Turn
Dear Truthout Community,
If you feel rage, despondency, confusion and deep fear today, you are not alone. We’re feeling it too. We are heartsick. Facing down Trump’s fascist agenda, we are desperately worried about the most vulnerable people among us, including our loved ones and everyone in the Truthout community, and our minds are racing a million miles a minute to try to map out all that needs to be done.
We must give ourselves space to grieve and feel our fear, feel our rage, and keep in the forefront of our mind the stark truth that millions of real human lives are on the line. And simultaneously, we’ve got to get to work, take stock of our resources, and prepare to throw ourselves full force into the movement.
Journalism is a linchpin of that movement. Even as we are reeling, we’re summoning up all the energy we can to face down what’s coming, because we know that one of the sharpest weapons against fascism is publishing the truth.
There are many terrifying planks to the Trump agenda, and we plan to devote ourselves to reporting thoroughly on each one and, crucially, covering the movements resisting them. We also recognize that Trump is a dire threat to journalism itself, and that we must take this seriously from the outset.
After the election, the four of us sat down to have some hard but necessary conversations about Truthout under a Trump presidency. How would we defend our publication from an avalanche of far right lawsuits that seek to bankrupt us? How would we keep our reporters safe if they need to cover outbreaks of political violence, or if they are targeted by authorities? How will we urgently produce the practical analysis, tools and movement coverage that you need right now — breaking through our normal routines to meet a terrifying moment in ways that best serve you?
It will be a tough, scary four years to produce social justice-driven journalism. We need to deliver news, strategy, liberatory ideas, tools and movement-sparking solutions with a force that we never have had to before. And at the same time, we desperately need to protect our ability to do so.
We know this is such a painful moment and donations may understandably be the last thing on your mind. But we must ask for your support, which is needed in a new and urgent way.
We promise we will kick into an even higher gear to give you truthful news that cuts against the disinformation and vitriol and hate and violence. We promise to publish analyses that will serve the needs of the movements we all rely on to survive the next four years, and even build for the future. We promise to be responsive, to recognize you as members of our community with a vital stake and voice in this work.
Please dig deep if you can, but a donation of any amount will be a truly meaningful and tangible action in this cataclysmic historical moment.
We’re with you. Let’s do all we can to move forward together.
With love, rage, and solidarity,
Maya, Negin, Saima, and Ziggy