Skip to content Skip to footer

Fair Trade Is Growing But Africans Lag Behind

Paris – Despite its minuscule share of world trade, fair trade is a booming business, importing certified foodstuffs and products from all over the world to Northern supermarkets. But there is increasing concern that this growth is yet to benefit poor countries in Africa. The movement to ensure decent prices and working conditions for producers in the developing world represents less than one percent of global commercial exchanges.

Paris – Despite its minuscule share of world trade, fair trade is a booming business, importing certified foodstuffs and products from all over the world to Northern supermarkets. But there is increasing concern that this growth is yet to benefit poor countries in Africa.

The movement to ensure decent prices and working conditions for producers in the developing world represents less than one percent of global commercial exchanges.

But, according to the Fairtrade Labelling Organisations, one of its main promoters, “the sales of fair trade certified products have been growing with an average of almost 40 percent per year in the last five years”.

Between 2007 and 2008 worldwide sales grew with 22 percent and by 2009 the tiny sector’s sales notched 3.6 billion euro. That same year, despite the global financial and economic crisis, fair trade sales in France alone increased by 10 percent.

But fair trade’s expansion in terms of sourcing from poor countries in Africa has been much slower.

“It is obvious that fair trade does not focus enough on least developed countries,” says Christophe Eberhart, of Ethiquable, a cooperative that imports fair trade foodstuffs to France from African least developed countries (LDCs).

One of Ethiquable’s initiatives supports vanilla farmers in Comoros, an island state off the eastern coast of Africa. The cooperative buys their flavouring vanilla pods at 100 euro per kilo, instead of the market prices of 25 euro.

Fair trade statistics do not disaggregate production figures by region, or by countries’ income category, which makes it hard to see the extent to which fair trade benefits LDCs. Moreover, “it is much easier to implement fair trade in countries such as Costa Rica, Thailand or India than in many sub-Saharan countries”, Eberhart contends.

Fair trade is increasingly popular with European consumers. In France, the Platform for Fair Trade (“Plate-Forme pour le Commerce Équitable” in French) polled consumers and found that 95 percent of them have heard of fair trade. But most fair trade success stories hailing from the South are from South America and Asia, rather than Africa.

Get Truthout in your inbox every day! Click here to sign up for free updates.

The Fairtrade Labelling Organisations’ 2009 report lists a growing number of consumer prizes awarded to fair trade products. Among an estimated 6,000 products, Bolivian vodka, Ecuadorian spicy banana chips and other niche delicacies were endorsed. But no African goods made the list.

“Fair trade importers such as ourselves work mainly with associations or cooperatives of producers,” Eberhart explains. “And these structures, which facilitate technical and financial assistance to farmers, are historically much more common in Latin America.”

“In Peru, for instance, the farmers’ cooperative running our jam manufacturing plant got help from local specialists to monitor quality,” he points out. “But in Mali, where we set up a unit to transform fonio (a grain variety), we have struggled to find local expertise to assist us with food safety processes.”

There are other structural challenges to trading with African LDCs. In order for fair trade to benefit a maximum number of people, decent prices and livelihood-sustaining wages have to be paid not only to producers but to workers throughout the entire production chain, including those working in packaging, transporting and shipping.

“Our approach to fair trade aims at working directly with producers’ organisations, and ensuring they export their own goods,” says Eberhart. “But, in Africa, we have observed that many producers rely on private exporters.”

Farmers thus lose the profits made on exports, which are generally much higher than those made merely on production.

“This does not help producers achieve greater capacity or autonomy,” Eberhart laments. “In Madagascar, for instance, very few producers and cooperatives export their products directly. Most of them rely on a few, very large exporters who hold all the bargaining power,” he adds.

As in all sectors of trade, size matters. Even producers benefiting from higher fair trade prices and expertise have to negotiate shipping fees. Larger producer organisations have more leverage.

“Ethiopian cooperatives producing coffee, for instance, tend to do well as they have larger volumes and better expertise,” says Eberhart.

The Fairtrade Labelling Organisations have developed a standard that applies not only to producers but also to traders. Its certification body, FLO-CERT, audits and certifies producers and traders before sales start. But limited resources and market structures make it almost impossible to check the entire chain from African fields to supermarket shelves.

Still, networks are expanding rapidly. The World Fair Trade Organisation now claims 600 member organisations in 70 countries. It is estimated that 1.5 million workers and producers participate in fair trade in Asia, Latin America and Africa.

“Our aim is for fair trade to be a real lever for development,” says Eberhart. “For that to happen, we need to help small farmers develop their own local capacity for the processing of their products and not to just facilitate sales.”

Ips_logo
Visit IPS news for fresh perspectives on development and globalization.

We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.

As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.

Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.

As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.

At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.

Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.

You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.