By 2050, the United States will be majority nonwhite. Latinos, blacks, Asians, and other “minorities” will constitute approximately 54 percent of our population, according to Census projections. We must decide what kind of society to create from this diverse mix: separate and unequal, or integrated and equal.
A recent University of Michigan study is a call to action for those seeking the latter. Researchers found that college students today are about 40 percent lower in empathy than their counterparts from the 1980s and 1990s. Present-day students are less interested in the perspectives of friends and are less concerned for the unfortunate.
Empathy is the ability to recognize, appreciate and respond to the feelings of other people. It is a fundamental building block of a healthy society. Empathy helps us understand our differences and our common ground. It enables us to go beyond the superficial to identify shared interests and accomplish collective goals. In an increasingly heterogeneous society, empathy is essential for cooperation and social cohesion and the pursuit of our nation’s highest ideals, including fairness, justice and equality.
The Michigan study joins a growing body of research that has found Americans growing more individualistic and isolated. Other studies have documented intensifying narcissism among college students since the late 1980s. Our society is becoming more disconnected and lonely, Jacqueline Olds and Richard S. Schwartz, Harvard psychiatrists concluded in their book “The Lonely American.”
A number of factors may contribute to this trend. The rising use of electronic social media, such as Facebook, along with email and other digital communication fosters shallow contact lacking the emotional texture of face-to-face interactions. Longer commutes, more time watching television and isolated suburban living reduces social connectivity, as Robert Putnam described in his book “Bowling Alone.” And following 9/11, the Bush administration’s “us versus them” dynamic fostered an atmosphere of distrust and hostility toward “others.”
Yet, the need for understanding, compassion and solidarity – for empathy – has never been greater. Barack Obama’s election lent some credence to the notion that we live in a “post-racial” society. But huge disparities in opportunity persist for poor people, immigrants and people of color, with injustices perpetuating poverty and other social ills. Black men are 6.5 times more likely to be in prison than white men. Income inequality is at an all-time high. Fifty-six years after the Supreme Court declared school segregation unconstitutional, schools are becoming more separate and unequal.
Today, California, Hawaii, Texas and New Mexico are already majority nonwhite, with millions of immigrants changing the face of our nation. This diversity provides conservatives with a tool and opportunity to construct their vision of society – one that is separate and unequal – by tapping into anger and frustration to pit Americans against each other.
There are alternatives that harmonize with our nation’s values. The empathy decline is a social phenomenon with social solutions: policies producing awareness, understanding and solidarity among all people – and doing so by fostering meaningful interactions, nurturing connections and creating an environment of mutual trust, respect and need. Chief among these are housing and education policies to promote integration.
Martin Luther King’s assault on segregation was rooted in the awareness that separation produces ignorance and stereotypes. Unfortunately, our communities are growing more divided along racial and class lines. A major contributor to the problem, notes Georgetown law Professor Sheryll Cashin, is the parochialism of local governments and their power to exclude poor people and people of color. Municipalities can use zoning and other regulations to restrict affordable housing, while school districts achieve segregation as effectively as Jim Crow.
Policies to foster residential integration include effective enforcement of fair housing and lending laws and providing more housing vouchers to low-income families that break up concentrated poverty and enable greater mobility. The use of inclusionary zoning should be broadened, requiring new developments to contain low- and moderate-income units. In education, we should create additional magnet schools for students across district lines and increase programs allowing urban students to attend suburban schools. And, perhaps most significantly, urban and suburban municipalities and school districts should be merged, breaking down barriers to sharing resources, broadening access to opportunity and helping students navigate our changing nation.
In 2008, Barack Obama, then a candidate for president, marked Martin Luther King Day with a speech decrying our nation’s “empathy deficit.” He described our “inability to recognize ourselves in one another” and called upon Americans to see that, in King’s words, “we are all tied together in a single garment of destiny.” Indeed, whether that destiny is one of shared, sustained prosperity may depend on our ability and willingness to understand, identify with and care for each other.
We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.
As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.
Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.
As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.
At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.
Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.
You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.