Skip to content Skip to footer

Elon Musk Op-Ed in German Newspaper Prompts Editor to Resign in Protest

The party that Musk is backing is vehemently anti-immigration, and regularly downplays the atrocities of Nazism.

Linda McMahon and Elon Musk attend the America First Policy Institute Gala held at Mar-a-Lago on November 14, 2024, in Palm Beach, Florida.

Truthout is a vital news source and a living history of political struggle. If you think our work is valuable, support us with a donation of any size.

An editor for a prominent newspaper in Germany has resigned in protest after the paper published an op-ed in which billionaire Elon Musk endorsed a far right political party.

Earlier this month, Musk signaled his support for Alternative for Germany (AfD) ahead of elections set to be held in that country in February.

AfD is widely recognized as a reactionary political party, emphasizing anti-immigration policies, particularly against Muslim migrants. Leaders of the party have frequently espoused racist and antisemitic statements, and have pushed for a return to a German “identity” — echoing rhetoric peddled by leaders of the Nazi Party during the mid-20th century.

AfD has also called for changing how Nazism is viewed historically within Germany. The party has suggested, for example, that monuments, schools and museums depicting the horrors of the Nazi regime, including the Holocaust, be altered, with one AfD party leader minimizing the atrocities perpetrated by the Nazis as “just a speck of bird’s muck.” Other leaders have outright denied that the Holocaust even occurred.

“Only the AfD can save Germany,” Musk wrote in a post on X, the social media site formerly known as Twitter.

This past weekend, the billionaire elaborated on his views, writing an op-ed once again endorsing AfD as his choice to lead the country.

The AfD is “the last spark of hope” for Germany, Musk claimed in the opinion pages of Welt am Sonntag, the newspaper in question, adding that he believed only that party can “lead the country into a future where economic prosperity, cultural integrity and technological innovation.”

Musk also mischaracterized AfD’s far right views, describing depictions of the party as “right-wing extremist” as being “false,” citing a single example of a member of the party having a same-sex partner.

“Does that sound like Hitler to you?” Musk asked in the op-ed, disregarding the fact that the AfD opposes marriage equality in Germany.

Musk’s op-ed was run alongside another, from the incoming editor-in-chief of Welt Jan Philipp Burgard. However, while that opinion piece expressed disagreement with Musk, it was gentle in condemning his endorsement of AfD.

“Musk’s diagnosis is correct, but his therapeutic approach, that only the AfD can save Germany, is fatally wrong,” Burgard’s op-ed stated.

Several journalists working for Welt expressed their anger to higher-ups at the paper for allowing Musk’s op-ed to run. Eva Marie Kogel, who until last week served as the publication’s opinion editor, resigned in protest of the decision to run the op-ed.

“I always enjoyed heading the opinion section of WELT … Today, an article by Elon Musk appeared in Welt am Sonntag,Kogel wrote on X. “I handed in my resignation yesterday after it went to print.”

Kogel received accolades on social media for taking a stand against the paper.

“I hope that Eva Marie Kogel will find a good home elsewhere and receive the support she deserves. Her integrity and courage deserve to be recognized,” German journalist Katharina Lotter wrote on Bluesky.

“Respect for Eva Marie Kogel, previously head of the opinion section at WELT,” Der Spiegel journalist Oliver Das Gupta wrote.

“Thank you, Eva Marie Kogel. May many more follow your example and walk upright into the new year,” author Katja Diehl said.

Important Message: Please Read

For 25 years, Truthout has survived by publishing impactful investigative journalism and analysis; distributing full editions 365 days a year; and building a community of readers who support us with small, hard-earned donations.

Eighty percent of our $3 million yearly budget comes from small donors alone. Of those, 8,000 readers support us with monthly donations. Back in 2018, when Facebook decided to suppress the circulation of posts made by organizations, thereby cutting readers off from seeing many articles shared by the news organizations they had intentionally decided to follow, Truthout’s total traffic declined by 40 percent, as nearly all of our traffic from that platform disappeared.

Now, Google has recently rolled out its AI search bar, providing AI summaries instead of directing readers to our site. Google Search is our single largest source of traffic; it’s the route by which nearly one third of our readers find us. Much like in 2018, a shocking 40 percent of our Google traffic has disappeared overnight.

It will not be easy for Truthout to shoulder this blow. Nor will it be easy for our peers and collaborators — news sites that depend on traffic and aren’t bankrolled by large corporations.

If you can support Truthout with a donation today, you can help us resist the AI onslaught. Please give today.