Washington – “There’s something else you need to know about me,” declared the earnest young politician, “which is I believe the test of a good and strong society is how we look after the most vulnerable, the most frail and the poorest.”
This lovely bleeding-heart liberal sentiment was part of the closing statement offered by David Cameron, the leader of Britain’s Conservative Party at last week’s final debate before this Thursday’s election. And after a rocky campaign start, Cameron now leads in the polls and may well become the next prime minister.
Contrast Cameron’s deliberate effort to reach out to voters who, as he has put it, have “idealism and progressive ideals hard-wired into their DNA” with what’s happening in the Republican Party.
In today’s GOP, someone like Cameron would be condemned as a big-government sellout and buried under a mountain of tea bags. For even as the news in Britain focused on Cameron’s comeback courtesy of his effort to detoxify the Conservative Party brand, the political news here was Florida Gov. Charlie Crist’s decision to abandon the Republicans and run for the U.S. Senate as an independent.
Of course there was self-interest involved. Crist would likely have lost the primary fight he just escaped to conservative Marco Rubio. But that’s also the point. Unlike the British Conservatives, our Republicans are forcing out big-tent politicians of Crist’s stripe wherever they can. When as solid a conservative as Utah’s Sen. Bob Bennett is in danger of being denied renomination, you know that the right-wing Jacobins are on the march.
There’s also this: The angry, incendiary and sometimes racist tone that is being projected at party rallies — and by legislation such as Arizona’s Don’t-Risk-Looking-Hispanic “immigration” law — is starting to give Democrats real hope that they might avoid electoral catastrophe this fall.
No sentient Democrat expects this to be a good year. But the closer the Republican Party is to the fringe, the easier it will be for Democrats to win back middle-of-the-road voters who have strayed since President Obama’s election.
“All this hyperbole and outrage and the tea party tiger the Republicans are riding are pushing them over the edge,” Rep. Earl Blumenauer said last week. The independent-minded Oregon Democrat is not given to partisan outbursts, but he sees the extreme posturing of Republicans combined with “the insanity of what’s going on in Arizona” as having the potential of changing the year’s political trajectory.
Republicans, from my conversations, are starting to worry that a purely negative approach to this fall’s elections will be insufficient to put the party over the top. That helps explain why House Republican Leader John Boehner took to National Public Radio (and not Glenn Beck’s show) to promise that the GOP would be about more than a large number of exclamation points after the word “no.”
“We have a project under way that people will see soon,” Boehner said, “that will engage the American people in helping us develop our agenda that we would enact if we’re fortunate enough to win the majority in November.” Of course there was negative even in the positive, since he acknowledged that part of this approach will be repealing and replacing this year’s health care bill.
The Arizona madness is a good example of how Republicans are working hard to rescue the Democrats. The state’s new law, pushed by Republicans in the Legislature and signed by the state’s Republican governor, would require police to question anyone of whom there is “reasonable suspicion” that they might be an undocumented immigrant.
It is so sweeping that as staunch a conservative as Jeb Bush came out against it for raising “civil liberties issues” that are “significant.” But many in his party (including, sadly, Sen. John McCain) are supporting the measure or, as in the case of Rep. Eric Cantor, the House Republican whip, declining to take a stand.
It tells you something when politicians are forced by pressures inside their party to embrace what they must know is wrong. And as a political matter, Republicans have just given Democrats a huge boost by reminding Latinos why it’s important to vote this fall.
In Britain, Prime Minister Gordon Brown’s Labor Party is trying to hang on by insisting that Cameron’s changes to the Conservative Party are merely cosmetic. Democrats don’t have that burden. Here, moderate Republicans are being forced to plaster themselves with right-wing makeup just to survive. Or, like Charlie Christ, they’re deciding to go natural, and leave.
E.J. Dionne’s e-mail address is [email protected].
(c) 2010, Washington Post Writers Group
Truthout Is Preparing to Meet Trump’s Agenda With Resistance at Every Turn
Dear Truthout Community,
If you feel rage, despondency, confusion and deep fear today, you are not alone. We’re feeling it too. We are heartsick. Facing down Trump’s fascist agenda, we are desperately worried about the most vulnerable people among us, including our loved ones and everyone in the Truthout community, and our minds are racing a million miles a minute to try to map out all that needs to be done.
We must give ourselves space to grieve and feel our fear, feel our rage, and keep in the forefront of our mind the stark truth that millions of real human lives are on the line. And simultaneously, we’ve got to get to work, take stock of our resources, and prepare to throw ourselves full force into the movement.
Journalism is a linchpin of that movement. Even as we are reeling, we’re summoning up all the energy we can to face down what’s coming, because we know that one of the sharpest weapons against fascism is publishing the truth.
There are many terrifying planks to the Trump agenda, and we plan to devote ourselves to reporting thoroughly on each one and, crucially, covering the movements resisting them. We also recognize that Trump is a dire threat to journalism itself, and that we must take this seriously from the outset.
After the election, the four of us sat down to have some hard but necessary conversations about Truthout under a Trump presidency. How would we defend our publication from an avalanche of far right lawsuits that seek to bankrupt us? How would we keep our reporters safe if they need to cover outbreaks of political violence, or if they are targeted by authorities? How will we urgently produce the practical analysis, tools and movement coverage that you need right now — breaking through our normal routines to meet a terrifying moment in ways that best serve you?
It will be a tough, scary four years to produce social justice-driven journalism. We need to deliver news, strategy, liberatory ideas, tools and movement-sparking solutions with a force that we never have had to before. And at the same time, we desperately need to protect our ability to do so.
We know this is such a painful moment and donations may understandably be the last thing on your mind. But we must ask for your support, which is needed in a new and urgent way.
We promise we will kick into an even higher gear to give you truthful news that cuts against the disinformation and vitriol and hate and violence. We promise to publish analyses that will serve the needs of the movements we all rely on to survive the next four years, and even build for the future. We promise to be responsive, to recognize you as members of our community with a vital stake and voice in this work.
Please dig deep if you can, but a donation of any amount will be a truly meaningful and tangible action in this cataclysmic historical moment.
We’re with you. Let’s do all we can to move forward together.
With love, rage, and solidarity,
Maya, Negin, Saima, and Ziggy