Skip to content Skip to footer

Donald Trump Jr. Told About Russian Government Efforts to Assist Campaign Last Summer, Was Enthusiastic

The emails display a pattern of behavior from Trump campaign officials that suggest a willingness to coordinate with a foreign power to swing an election.

Donald Trump Jr. arrives at Trump Tower on January 18, 2017, in New York City. (Photo: John Moore / Getty Images)

A stunning email thread released by Donald Trump Jr. on Tuesday shows the President’s son saying he “loves” the idea of obtaining incriminating information on Hillary Clinton from the Russian government.

The exchange also revealed that Trump Jr. was directly told that the Kremlin supports his father’s candidacy.

The existence of the emails contradict the Trump administration’s narrative on Russia, primarily that Moscow was not trying to aid Donald Trump’s candidacy last year, despite the conclusion of the US intelligence community.

In the back-and-forth, Trump Jr. is told by British promoter and friend Rob Goldstone that the “Crown Prosecutor of Russia” was interested in providing the Trump campaign with “official documents and information that would incriminate Hillary and her dealing with Russia.”

There is no “crown prosecutor” in Russia, but Goldstone may have been referring to the Russian prosecutor general, Yuri Yakovlevich.

Goldstone goes on to inform Trump Jr. that “this is obviously very high level and sensitive information but is part of Russia and its government’s support for Mr. Trump.”

In response, Trump Jr. wrote “if it’s what you say I love it especially later in the summer.”

A few days later, Goldstone sets up a meeting for Trump Jr. to discuss the matter further with a Russian lawyer, Natalia Veselnitskaya, who the New York Times reports is “known to be close” with Russian prosecutor general Yakovlevich.

The Times was going to publish the emails before Trump Jr. released them on his own through Twitter. The paper has for days been reporting on the meeting Trump Jr. eventually had with Veselnitskaya on June 9, shortly after Trump clinched the GOP nomination.

The rendezvous took place in the future President’s son’s office in Trump Towers, in New York City, one floor below the elder Trump’s office. Also in attendance for the meeting were Trump’s son-in-law Jared Kushner and newly-enshrined campaign chairman at the time, Paul Manafort. Trump Jr. claimed that his father was not told of meeting.

Exactly what was discussed is still unknown. Both Trump Jr. and Veselnitskaya have claimed that the primary topic of the meeting was the Magnitsky Act — a law that provides for sanctions against Russian officials.

In an interview with NBC, Veselnitskaya claimed she did not have any damaging information to provide the Trump campaign. She also claimed that Kushner left the meeting early and Manafort spent most of the time looking at his phone.

There’s no indication that alleged Russian hacking activities were discussed in the meeting. The sit-down took place shortly before Wikileaks began publishing leaked internal emails from the Democratic National Committee (DNC). Those records were hacked, according to the US government, by Russian military and intelligence services.

It’s also unclear if Trump Jr. broke the law by accepting the meeting. Campaign finance law prohibits political entities from receiving things of value — money or opposition research — from foreign entities. Trump Jr. claims the meeting was unproductive and didn’t result in the acquisition of any opposition research.

The emails do display, however, a pattern of behavior from Trump campaign officials that suggest a willingness to coordinate with a foreign power to swing an election. Such evidence could be fruitful for the ongoing counterintelligence investigation at the Department of Justice, which is currently being led by Robert Mueller.

Lawmakers on Capitol Hill were gobsmacked by the revelation. Sen. Tim Kaine (D-Va.) said Trump Jr. may have committed “treason.”

Members of Trump’s own party were concerned, too. “That email is disturbing,” Sen. Lindsay Graham (R-S.C.) told reporters. “I know Donald Trump Jr. is new to politics, I know that Jared Kushner is new to politics, but this is going to require a lot of questions to be asked and answered.”

Despite the bombshell news reports on Tuesday, the Trump administration declined again on Tuesday to hold an on-camera White House press briefing.

We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.

As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.

Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.

As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.

At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.

Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.

You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.