Dominion Voting Systems, an election technology company that Rudy Giuliani and others aligned with former President Donald Trump falsely alleged played a hand in changing the outcome of the 2020 presidential election, filed a lawsuit against Fox News on Friday for its coverage and dissemination of those conspiracy theories.
Fox News guests and hosts engaged in the spreading of false information about the election, including suggesting that Dominion voting machines were made in Venezuela in order to manipulate votes to help then-candidate Joe Biden win the race, the lawsuit alleges. Such claims have no basis in reality, and there is no evidence whatsoever that Dominion played a role in altering vote totals.
The company is suing Fox News for a total of $1.6 billion in damages, alleging that the claims made on its program and by its on-air personalities amounted to defamation against Dominion, resulting in significant financial harm to them.
“Fox engaged in this knowing and reckless propagation of these enormous falsehoods in order to profit off these lies,” the lawsuit states. “Fox wanted to continue to protect its broadcast ratings, catering to an audience deeply loyal to President Trump.”
Dominion claims that Fox News attempted to rectify ratings plunges that had occurred after the election by engaging in dissemination of knowingly false information. The lawsuit states that:
Fox, through its most prominent on-air personalities, cynically exploited these lies to lure viewers back. For example, from November 8-12, 2020, Maria Bartiromo and Lou Dobbs repeatedly hosted [Trump-aligned lawyer Sidney] Powell and [Trump’s former personal lawyer Rudy] Giuliani on their Fox programs where they also endorsed and repeated their guests’ lies about Dominion. (emphasis added)
“The truth matters. Lies have consequences,” the lawsuit from Dominion goes on to say. “Fox sold a false story of election fraud in order to serve its own commercial purposes, severely injuring Dominion in the process. If this case does not rise to the level of defamation by a broadcaster, then nothing does.”
Dominion is the second election technology company to file a lawsuit against Fox over its spreading of false conspiracy theories in the aftermath of the 2020 election. Smartmatic also sued Fox for $2.7 billion in February, making similar allegations.
Fox has not yet filed a legal response to Dominion, but it has responded to the Smartmatic suit, stating that, “The public had a right to know, and Fox had a right to cover, that the president and his allies were accusing Smartmatic (and others) of manipulating the election results, regardless of the ultimate truth or accuracy of those allegations.”
Such claims may not be enough to mount a proper legal defense, however, Harvard Law School professor Laurence Tribe opined on Twitter this morning.
“Fox News will no doubt claim the 1st Amendment gives it an impenetrable shield against liability for defaming Dominion with claims it had to know were fake,” Tribe tweeted. “But that shield isn’t as absolute as Fox might wish. This will be an important case to watch.”
We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.
As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.
Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.
As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.
At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.
Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.
You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.