The Department of Justice (DOJ) has subpoenaed former White House personnel to discuss the firing of Christopher Krebs, a cybersecurity expert who worked in the Trump administration and who outspokenly disagreed with the former president’s false election fraud claims, as part of its investigation into the former president’s attempts to overturn the 2020 presidential election.
Krebs was terminated by Donald Trump, via tweet, in mid-November 2020, after the department he oversaw (Homeland Security’s Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency, or CISA) contradicted claims being made by Trump and his allies regarding the election. Far from being rife with fraud, as Trump had alleged, “The November 3rd election was the most secure in American history,” according to a statement issued from CISA.
Before his firing, Krebs also used his government Twitter account to share a post from elections expert David Becker, who called the fraud claims by Trump “fantasies” that had “been debunked many times.”
Trump responded by firing Krebs on Twitter.
“The recent statement by Chris Krebs on the security of the 2020 Election was highly inaccurate, in that there were massive improprieties and fraud – including dead people voting, Poll Watchers not allowed into polling locations, ‘glitches’ in the voting machines which changed votes from Trump to Biden, late voting, and many more,” Trump said in his announcement on Krebs, making proclamations that have all been proven to be untrue.
On Wednesday, The New York Times reported that special counsel Jack Smith had questioned former Trump officials, including Krebs himself, regarding his termination two and a half years ago.
Smith, who was appointed as special counsel after Trump declared himself a 2024 presidential candidate, is overseeing two investigations at the DOJ relating to the former president. Recent revelations about Trump’s post-presidential handling of classified documents — including the likelihood of him sharing those documents with others at Mar-a-Lago, possibly in violation of the Espionage Act — have been grabbing headlines as of late. But Smith is also overseeing the investigation into Trump’s actions after his 2020 election loss to President Joe Biden, including his efforts to usurp the democratic process so that he could remain in the White House.
Reports on the Justice Department’s investigation of Krebs’s firing indicates that the inquiry is probing Trump’s actions during the final weeks of his presidency. Trump and his allies engaged in many questionable actions that Smith is also investigating that some legal experts view as possibly being illegal, including the coordinating of a slate of fake electors from several states to disrupt the certification process of the Electoral College on January 6, 2021.
Krebs’s firing is also part of a broader attempt by the DOJ to understand how the White House’s personnel office, under Trump, became deeply politicized, including its demand for the loyalty of current employees at that time and potential hires in the final months of his presidency. The office created a loyalty test, for example, as part of its hiring process. The department is also questioning former officials over Trump’s attempt to use the DOJ to give undue credibility to his unfounded election fraud claims.
We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.
As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.
Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.
As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.
At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.
Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.
You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.