The Supreme Court on Monday reversed a lower court’s injunction on federal action to remove razor wire installed by Texas state officials last fall on a stretch of the state’s border with Mexico.
Gov. Greg Abbott (R-Texas) ordered the razor wire to be installed in October to deter migrants from crossing a 29-mile stretch of land along the Rio Grande River. Migrant rights organizations have said the order violates international law, and has resulted in numerous horrific injuries for migrants attempting to cross the barrier. At least one internal email from a Texas state trooper described the razor wire barriers as “inhumane.”
U.S. Border Patrol agents began removing the wire later that month, resulting in the state suing the agency in federal court in order to halt that action.
In November, a federal judge placed an injunction on the action to continue removing the barrier pending the completion of the lawsuit. The U.S. government appealed that order to the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals, which affirmed the ruling from the judge. The federal government then filed an emergency appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court, which disagreed with both the federal judge’s and appellate court’s rulings.
In filing its appeal to the Supreme Court, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) claimed that allowing the lower courts’ rulings to stand would redefine the supremacy clause of the U.S. Constitution, leaving the federal government “at the mercy of States” in trying to implement a national immigration strategy.
The two-paragraph order from the High Court was unsigned and didn’t delve into the justices’ legal views on the matter. Four justices from the Court — Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito, Neil Gorsuch and Brett Kavanaugh — indicated that they dissented with the majority opinion, signaling that it was a 5-4 decision and that Justices Sonia Sotomayor, Elena Kagan, Ketanji Brown Jackson, Amy Coney Barrett and Chief Justice John Roberts sided with the federal government.
The ruling doesn’t end the case altogether, but rather focuses only on the injunctive order from the lower court. Texas and the U.S. government will still adjudicate the question within the court on whether the state can place razor wire in the area, and whether it can be removed by Border Patrol officials.
In a statement on X (formerly known as Twitter), Abbott promised to continue challenging the federal government on the matter.
“This is not over,” Abbott said. “Texas’ razor wire is an effective deterrent to the illegal crossings Biden encourages. I will continue to defend Texas’ constitutional authority to secure the border and prevent the Biden Admin from destroying our property.”
Aaron Reichlin-Melnick, policy director at the American Immigration Council, challenged Abbott’s assertions.
“Texas’ shenanigans didn’t cause migrants to stop crossing the border,” Reichlin-Melnick said, adding that the action “has just caused slightly fewer crossings in a section of the border that amounts to 0.1% of the border’s length (2 miles out of 2,000).”
Immigration lawyer Cyrus Mehta also stated that the Supreme Court ruled correctly on this case.
“Biden rightly wins over Texas here. A state cannot and should not be able to dabble in immigration issues which the federal government occupies,” Mehta said.
We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.
As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.
Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.
As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.
At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.
Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.
You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.