Skip to content Skip to footer

Democrats to Supreme Court: Allegations on Thomas, Alito Must Be Investigated

The Democrats urged Chief Justice John Roberts to create an investigative arm of SCOTUS.

Justice Clarence Thomas swears in Judge Amy Coney Barrett as the 115th justice to the Supreme Court on October 26, 2020.

A group of Democrats is urging Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts to open investigations into Justices Samuel Alito and Clarence Thomas following a series of allegations about the justices’ ties to Republican billionaires and their repeated violations of finance laws.

Eighteen House Democrats sent a letter to Roberts on Tuesday, urging him to open an investigatory arm within the Court and saying that the group’s investigations should start with Alito and Thomas. The letter was led by Rep. Dan Goldman (D-New York) and signed by members who represent former employees in the criminal legal system. The letter was first reported on by NBC.

The Democrats expressed deep concern that Roberts has refused to enforce ethics principles for justices and has instead insisted that the justices can police themselves — despite no real incentive to do so and no evidence that they are willing to, either.

“Despite your insistence that the Court can police itself, you have provided no rationale or vision for how the Court will do so,” the lawmakers wrote. “Moreover, the Court’s failure to conduct a meaningful, independent investigation into allegations against Justices Thomas and Alito only underscores widespread concerns that the Supreme Court is not subject to a code of ethics or an adequate enforcement process.”

The lawmakers went on to detail the many concerns that have been raised about Thomas and Alito in recent months and years.

Thomas has been facing calls to resign or be removed from the Court for over a year now. First, it was over his wife’s close ties and role in orchestrating the January 6, 2021, attack on the Capitol, as the lawmakers pointed out. Thomas has also hidden huge sums of money that his wife was paid by shady right-wing interests, including Leonard Leo’s deal to pay her at least $80,000 from a judicial nonprofit and her payments from the far right Heritage Foundation, totalling over $686,000 between 2003 and 2007.

In recent weeks, the calls for Thomas’s removal have been reignited in the face of stunning revelations that, for years, Thomas accepted and didn’t disclose lavish gifts from and a least one real estate deal with GOP megadonor Harlan Crow, with hundreds of thousands of dollars of gifts or cash being funneled to the Supreme Court justice.

“We are especially concerned about the numerous recent reports of Justice Clarence Thomas’s highly questionable ethical decisions, including conflicts of interests related to his wife and other beneficial financial relationships with billionaire and political donor Harlan Crow and Leonard Leo, who oversees a multi-billion-dollar dark money operation to influence the Supreme Court,” the lawmakers wrote. “The Court does not appear to have conducted an investigation into any of these allegations.”

“Using a revamped and independent internal investigative process, we urge that investigative body to engage in a substantial investigation — culminating with a public report — on the many allegations of ethical lapses and conflicts of interest,” they continued.

The lawmakers then went into allegations against Alito, who was the subject of a ProPublica investigation published last week that found that Alito has accepted at least one gift from GOP hedge fund billionaire Paul Singer, valued at at least $100,000. Later, when Singer’s hedge fund had a case in front of the Supreme Court, Alito ruled in his favor, and the hedge fund was paid $2.4 billion as a result of the ruling.

Alito has also been under scrutiny over his alleged leaking of the decision of Burwell v. Hobby Lobby, a landmark 2014 case that set a precedent allowing religious employers to opt out of covering certain contraceptive care for employees, in a huge win for evangelical, right-wing activists and a huge loss for reproductive rights.

The Alito and Thomas allegations “pose grave threats to the legitimacy of the Court,” the lawmakers concluded. “If, as you say, the Court is capable of upholding the highest ethical standards, then we hope you will accept our recommendations to establish an independent and transparent investigative body and separate ethics counsel to regain the trust and confidence of the American people.”

We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.

As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.

Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.

As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.

At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.

Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.

You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.