
Public Citizen / Flickr)” width=”400″ height=”300″ />Rep. Henry Waxman. (Photo: Public Citizen / Flickr)Democrats in Congress have introduced legislation that would restore net-neutrality rules struck down last month by a federal appeals court. But the bill faces a steep uphill battle in the House, where some Republicans oppose any expansion of regulatory power at the FCC.
Democrats in Congress introduced legislation Monday that would restore the Federal Communications Commission’s (FCC) net-neutrality rules that were struck down by a federal appeals court last month.
The move comes just days after activists representing more than 80 organizations, including the Free Press, Common Cause and Colorofchange.org, delivered a petition with 1 million signatures to FCC Chairman Tom Wheeler demanding that the agency take action on restoring net neutrality regulations. Last week, President Obama said in a Google hangout that he supports net neutrality and is confident that the FCC will use its authority to protect the open internet.
In January, a federal court threw out the FCC’s net-neutrality rules after a challenge from Verizon. The court also affirmed the FCC’s ability to regulate the Internet, and the FCC could set new net-neutrality rules if it decides to reclassify the web as a “common carrier” telecommunications service like telephone lines instead of an information service.
Net neutrality is the principle that all Internet traffic should be treated equally, and in 2010, the FCC issued Open Internet rules that prevented broadband providers from blocking and discriminating against web content. Before being thrown out, the rules kept broadband providers from awarding faster loading speeds to websites that pay special fees and blocking lawful websites and applications, such as those offered by their competition.
The telecomm industry and anti-regulation activists say net neutrality rules stifle innovation and put too much power in the hands of the FCC, but open Internet advocates says net neutrality rules are needed to protect consumers and innovative web startups as well as the voices of minority groups online. Without net neutrality, they argue, big telecomm companies such as AT&T would shape the Internet to maximize profit.
The legislation introduced this week would restore the net neutrality rules thrown out in court until the FCC makes a final decision on enforcing net neutrality. California Democrats Henry Waxman and Anna Eshoo introduced the bill in the House, and Ed Markey, a Massachusetts Democrat, is expected to introduce companion legislation in the Senate.
“Our bill very simply ensures that consumers can continue to access the content and applications of their choosing online,” said Waxman, a ranking member of the House Energy and Commerce Committee. “The FCC can and must quickly exercise the authorities the [court] recognized to reinstate the Open Internet rules. Our bill makes clear that consumers and innovators will be protected in the interim.”
The bill faces a steep uphill battle in the GOP-controlled House, where some Republicans openly oppose any expansion of regulatory power at the FCC, including Greg Walden of Oregon, chairman of the communications and technology subcommittee, which must take up the bill.
Wheeler has pledged to take swift action on net neutrality at recent public appearances but has remained vague as to his plans for addressing the issue. Progressive activists hope he will push the FCC to classify the web as a “common carrier” service and assume broad regulatory power over the Internet to protect consumers, but Wheeler has hinted that he may prefer taking a piecemeal approach and go after service providers that make anticompetitive moves on a case-by-case basis.
We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.
As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.
Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.
As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.
At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.
Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.
You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.