Skip to content Skip to footer

Democratic Campaign Committee Endorses NRA-Backed Blue Dogs in Midterm Elections

Several candidates have the NRA’s “A” rating.

Rep. Henry Cuellar speaks during the Blue Dog Coalition news conference on Wednesday, October 4, 2017. (Photo: Bill Clark / CQ Roll Call)

The mass shooting at Parkland High School in Broward County, Florida, has inspired a surge of activism among the school’s students and others across the country in pushing for gun control measures. Despite this momentum and popular support in favor of legislation that would regulate gun purchases, the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee (DCCC) is openly endorsing and financially backing several Blue Dog Conservative Democrats in congressional races across the country with ties to the National Rifle Association (NRA) and other industries that primarily back Republicans.

Rep. Henry Cuellar (D-Texas), an NRA ally with the highest rating the organization gives to politicians who vote in line with its interest — an “A” — has voted with Trump more than 64 percent of the time, though his district’s political demographics lean nine points in favor of Democrats, according to the Cook Political Report — meaning Republicans aren’t very competitive in the district. Hillary Clinton won Cuellar’s district by 19 points in the 2016 presidential election.

Though VICE recently rated Cuellar as the top Democrat in Congress who warrants a progressive primary challenger, he is running unopposed in the primary and general election. Cuellar’s lack of opposition in his district has enabled him to support Republicans’ agenda, while asserting himself into Democratic Party leadership. DCCC Chair Ben Ray Lujan serves as co-chair of the DCCC Latino Council with Cuellar, who also serves as co-chair of the Blue Dog PAC and co-chair of the Blue Dog Coalition in Congress. Lujan told Bloomberg in July 2017 that Blue Dogs have “been incredible partners” in developing the party strategy for the 2018 midterm elections. Nine of the DCCC-backed candidates so far this election cycle have also been endorsed by the Blue Dog PAC.

The DCCC has embraced Cuellar’s support and Blue Dog-based strategies for the midterm elections, despite his open embrace of the NRA and other nefarious industries. So far this election cycle, Cuellar’s largest campaign donor is the private prison company GEO Group, which is expected to earn more than $600 million in a decade through government contracts for private immigration detention centers, and faced lawsuits for forced labor in their prisons. Given that Cuellar’s congressional district extends to the US-Mexico border, these donations are problematic in undermining progressive efforts to abolish the private prison industry that has perpetuated mass incarceration for profit. During the Obama administration, Cuellar joined Republicans on immigration and border policies, drawing criticism from the Congressional Hispanic Caucus.

Rep. Cuellar has made several large contributions to the DCCC — in addition to his congressional dues that Democratic members of Congress are expected to fundraise for the DCCC. His campaign made a $150,000 contribution to the DCCC in 2017, and over the past few years, has been one of the most prolific fundraisers for the DCCC. Politico reported in July 2017 that “Blue Dog and DCCC staffers now meet on a weekly basis, and leaders of the centrist coalition say the campaign arm is working hand in hand with them on recruitment.” The DCCC did not respond to Truthout’s request for comment.

The influence of the Blue Dogs in DCCC recruitment is evident in the candidates endorsed by the DCCC, many of whom are facing progressive challengers in primaries. As part of the DCCC’s “Red to Blue” program to help support Democrats in districts currently held by Republicans, the Democratic Party is manufacturing primary nominees who have long records in support from the NRA. In New Jersey, the DCCC, the Blue Dog Caucus and several county Democratic Party chairs are rallying behind Jeff Van Drew to run in the 2nd congressional district. Van Drew has a “100 percent” rating from the NRA during his tenure as a State Senator.

The DCCC is backing several other candidates with NRA and gun lobby ties. In the New York State Assembly, Anthony Brindisi, a congressional candidate in the 22nd district, joined Republicans to oppose the 2013 gun control legislation, New York’s SAFE Act, and received a “100 percent” rating from the NRA in 2017. In Virginia, candidate Elaine Luria voted for the NRA “A”-rated Republican incumbent Scott Taylor in her district twice — in the 2016 Republican primary and the general election. Conor Lamb, the Democratic candidate in Pennsylvania’s special election in the 18th district, has dodged taking a stance in favor of gun control, instead emphasizing mental health. Ann Kirkpatrick, who is running for Arizona’s 2nd congressional district after a failed Senate bid in 2016, received an “A” rating from the NRA in 2012 and previously praised the organization, though she has shifted on the issue since. She now supports an assault weapons ban that she previously opposed, and has publicly criticized the NRA.

The NRA’s most recent federally-backed legislation was a House vote in December 2017 to allow non-residents of a state the ability to conceal-carry guns in states that permit it. Six Democrats voted in favor of the bill with Republicans: Rep. Henry Cuellar (D-Texas), Rep. Sanford Bishop (D-Georgia), Rep. Vicente Gonzalez (D-Texas), Rep. Kurt Schrader (D-Oregon), Rep. Collin Peterson (D-Minnesota) and Rep. Ron Kind (D-Wisconsin). In the 2016 election cycle, Cuellar, Bishop, Peterson and Rep. Tim Walz (D-Minnesota) were the only House Democrats to receive donations from the NRA.

In media appearances, Cuellar has consistently reaffirmed his NRA-friendly positions on guns. He appeared on Fox News in October 2017 to affirm that Democrats should not “politicize” the Las Vegas mass shooting by calling for gun control, a Republican talking point. The next month, Cuellar told NBC’s “Meet the Press” that, “If somebody wants to kill somebody, they will find a way,” when asked about gun control as a solution to mass shootings in the wake of the Sutherland Springs shooting in his own district. Representative Cuellar’s office did not respond to Truthout’s request for comment on his gun control stances or involvement with the DCCC.

In addition to these Democrats, Rep. Darren Soto (D-Florida), first elected to Congress in 2016, has a long record of support from the NRA in the Florida State Legislature, receiving several “A” ratings, and voting in 2015 to strengthen the controversial “Stand Your Ground” law.

The NRA’s support for Democrats has waned over recent years as the party has trended more in favor of gun control measures — to the point where even past NRA allies like Sen. Joe Manchin (D-West Virginia) are finding themselves opposing the organization that formerly provided them financial backing. But the DCCC and Democratic Party’s open support for more candidates with NRA leanings suggests the party’s leadership is favoring a trend further to the right, in opposition to progressives pushing the party to the left.

We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.

As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.

Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.

As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.

At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.

Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.

You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.