Washington – Rick Perry should have backed off. Instead, he doubled down, and in a way that was doubly illuminating — about Perry himself and the degraded state of modern politics.
The issue, amazingly enough, is President Obama's birthplace — months after the release of his long-form birth certificate should have laid the matter to rest. In an interview with Parade magazine, the Texas governor declared Obama's place of birth a “distractive” issue even as he happily latched on to the opportunity to distract.
“Well, I don't have a definitive answer (about whether Obama was born in the United States), because he's never seen my birth certificate,” Perry said. It was classic Perry: a trademark combination of logical incoherence and smarmy cheap shot.
A smarter candidate would have stopped there. Perry, in an interview with CNBC's John Harwood, kept going, despite Harwood's repeated invitations to walk back his silliness.
“Look, I haven't seen his,” Perry said. “I haven't seen his grades. My grades ended up on the front page of the newspaper, so let's, you know, if we're going to show stuff, let's show stuff. “
Is this a presidential campaign or a middle-school playground? I'll show you mine if you show me yours? By the way, if I had Perry's grades, I wouldn't be mentioning them. Certainly not if I were running against a former president of the Harvard Law Review.
But then Perry, as is his style, let on what this was really about. “But look, that's all a distraction. I mean, I get it. I'm really not worried about the president's birth certificate. It's fun to poke at him a little bit and say, 'Hey, how about let's see your grades and your birth certificate.'”
The matter of the president's birthplace, Perry added, is “a good issue to keep alive.”
You might think this was the candidate cannily trying to have it both ways: a nod to the birther crazies with a simultaneous wink at those who know this is a ridiculous distraction. Except that Perry managed to step on his real message of the day: his unaffordable and unfair proposal to “simplify” the tax code — by grafting a flat-tax alternative onto the existing system.
Perry's acknowledgement of his interest in benefiting from birther mania was reminiscent of his artless dodge, during the last debate, about whether he thought the 14th Amendment should be changed to abolish birthright citizenship. “You get to ask the questions,” he told moderator Anderson Cooper. “I get to answer like I want to.”
Note to candidate: Better not to narrate your own stage directions. Just because your debate coaches tell you to answer the question you want to answer, not the one that's been asked, doesn't mean you should announce that's what you're up to.
Now we have Perry, who has a decent if fading shot at the Republican presidential nomination, openly practicing politics as poke-fest. The point isn't to debate whose solutions are best for America — it's to get under the other guy's skin.
Thus Perry needling Mitt Romney on immigration. “You hired illegals in your home and you knew about it for a year. And the idea that you stand here before us and talk about that you're strong on immigration is on its face the height of hypocrisy.”
As it happens, Perry is righter — that is, more correct — than Romney on immigration, at least when it comes to the question of the DREAM Act and the ability of the children of illegal immigrants to obtain in-state tuition rates.
But Perry's jab at Romney was below the belt. The former Massachusetts governor employed a landscaping firm that, The Boston Globe discovered, had hired illegal immigrants. Romney told it to stop. When it turned out it hadn't, he fired the firm.
The matter of Obama's birth certificate should be a closed case. It is astonishing that a sitting governor, no less a serious candidate for president, would stoop to playing this game.
Then again, 2012 is shaping up to be an astonishing campaign. Witness Herman Cain's bizarre, substance-less new ad in which the candidate is endorsed by, yes, the candidate's campaign manager. Who is actually smoking (literally) during the ad.
“I really believe that Herman Cain will put United back in the United States of America,” says the aide, Mark Block.
The country is facing serious problems. This will be a fateful election. Voters deserve better than scare tactics and drivel.
We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.
As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.
Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.
As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.
At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.
Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.
You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.