A new analysis finds that states that have implemented abortion bans following far right Supreme Court justices’ overturn of Roe v. Wade also tend to have the worst levels of parental support in terms of poverty rates, rates of insured people and health outcomes.
NPR reports that the 14 states with abortion bans are among the states with the highest rates of child poverty, people living in maternal health care deserts and women who are uninsured. Nine states that are in the process of passing bans, or that have passed bans that ended up being blocked by a judge or otherwise, also have poor parental support, the data shows.
The report only included women in its health insurance analysis, though trans men and nonbinary people are also affected by abortion bans, often disproportionately so. However, the analysis gives weight to arguments that abortion bans are horrific and inhumane, and serve partially as a right-wing tool to further punish non-white and poor people.
Of the 12 states that opted not to expand Medicaid after the Affordable Care Act allowed low-income adults to access the program, eight have banned abortion, while lawmakers in at least two others are attempting to pass a ban.
Opting not to expand Medicaid doesn’t just stop many people with low incomes from being able to access health care — it also bars them from accessing funds for childbirth. Childbirth is incredibly expensive and comes with costs amounting to a down payment on a house in many states. Although Medicaid pays for about 42 percent of all births in the U.S., states could prevent more people from having to take on debt or spend significant chunks of their incomes on childbirth if they opted to expand the program.
Limited access to parental care compounds upon affordability issues. In states like Georgia, Mississippi, South Carolina, and Wisconsin — all of which have declined to expand Medicaid — there are large proportions of people who live in maternal care deserts, with around 20 percent or more of the population living in counties with limited or no access to such health services, according to NPR. Overall, eight of the 10 states with the highest proportion of their populations living in maternal care deserts have implemented abortion bans.
As a result of such problems — and decisions by lawmakers in many states with bans to give less financial assistance to parents — there are higher rates of child poverty in states with abortion bans. Seven of the 10 states with the worst child poverty rates, as ranked using Census Bureau data, have abortion bans. Experts say that abortion access has a direct link to a reduction in child poverty rates, contradicting what some GOP lawmakers have implied.
States with abortion bans also have worse health outcomes for babies and their parents. Of the six states with the worst rates of low birth weight, which can be an indicator for other health issues, five have abortion bans, while the sixth has had its abortion ban temporarily suspended by a judge.
Research has found that the U.S. is expected to experience a spike in parental death due to newly implemented abortion bans. University of Colorado researchers found earlier this year that states with already high maternal mortality and abortion rates would see an increase in maternal death of nearly 30 percent.
Overall, if a nationwide abortion ban were implemented — legislation that Republicans are threatening to pass if they take control of Congress — maternal deaths would increase by 24 percent. Black parents are especially at risk, as Black maternal deaths could undergo an increase of up to 39 percent.
NPR’s findings echo those of previous analyses. Last month, The New York Times similarly reported that families in states that have banned or are likely to ban abortion have worse financial and health incomes, while policies implemented in these states are more hostile to low-income parents.
Within states where abortion is banned or likely to be banned, about 18.5 percent of children were in poverty on average, versus 14.8 percent in states that are unlikely to ban abortion. Maternal deaths are also higher in states that have banned or are likely to ban abortion, at 25.2 deaths per 100,000 live births versus 15.0 deaths in non-ban states.
We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.
As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.
Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.
As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.
At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.
Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.
You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.