Skip to content Skip to footer

Dangerous Combo: Violence in Pregnancy and HIV in South Africa

An estimated one in four South African women experience intimate partner violence in the 12 months leading up to childbirth.

When Phumzile Khoza* came to the central Johannesburg antenatal clinic on a chilly day in August 2013, she was feeling on edge. Not about the medical procedures – she already had two children – but about talking to the nurse.

This was her third pregnancy living with HIV, but the first with a new partner from whom she had been hiding her status for the past two years.

This pregnancy had been rocky from the start. Khoza had been trying to convince her partner to join her for HIV testing, but he refused. Without couples’ counseling, Khoza was afraid to disclose, and it was becoming harder to take and hide her daily medication of antiretrovirals (ARV).

Khoza’s partner was now regularly slapping her, punching her stomach, and kicking her during arguments. Khoza feared it would get worse if he learned she was HIV-positive.

Although she wanted help, Khoza imagined the nurses would not have time to talk through her complex situation. Plus, she had seen how angry the nurses became with women who defaulted on ARV treatment.

Looking back on that antenatal visit, Khoza reflected: “I was stressing about the way I lived my life, stressing about my past, stressing about my pregnancy. And I had no one.”

Shocking Figures

Khoza’s story is increasingly common. An estimated one in four South African women experience intimate partner violence in the 12 months leading up to childbirth.

Violence in pregnancy is associated with pregnancy loss, miscarriage and neonatal death, higher rates of postpartum depression and poor health gains for infants.

Fast Facts about HIV in South Africa:

• 18% HIV prevalence among people aged 15-49

• 150,000 women newly infected in 2012

• 14,000 new infections among children in 2012

• 3 million women live with HIV

Source: UNAIDS 2013

In a systematic review of the literature, Dr Simukai Shamu, a Medical Research Council expert on violence, found that prevalence of violence among pregnant women in Africa is among the highest reported globally, and that a major risk factor for violence is HIV infection.

“Because most studies are cross-sectional, it’s difficult to tell whether violence was a result of demands or changes in life due to pregnancy, or if the pregnancy was the outcome of violence,” Shamu told IPS.

Since early 2013, a team from Wits Reproductive Health and HIV Institute (Wits RHI) has been interviewing women living with violence in Johannesburg.

Lead researcher Nataly Woollett said that many women described pregnancy as a time of greater violence.

“Partly because they had to disclose their HIV status and partly because men use the woman’s antenatal visit –where testing is virtually mandatory – as a proxy for their own HIV status, so they are curious about the results,” she told IPS.

At the same clinic, IPS met Martha Ramphele*, who described the rapid escalation of violence that landed her in hospital while six-months pregnant: “He started telling me that I’m a fool and stupid. And then he strangled me and let his cousin beat me up.”

Ramphele reported the incident to the police, but later withdrew the charges to protect her safety and financial security. She suspected her HIV disclosure led to physical abuse, but she couldn’t be sure.

No one can say precisely what triggers violence, but often the blend of stress associated with pregnancy, the shifting power and control dynamics, coupled with a new HIV diagnosis, are enough to heighten conflict.

The Nurses’ Response

Violence in pregnancy impacts negatively on the health of HIV positive women.

Sister Marieta Booysen, a senior nurse with the Aurum Institute, a research organisation in Johannesburg, explained that pregnant women in violent relationships are the most likely to quit treatment: “When you tell a patient she is HIV-positive but she is scared to disclose to her partner, it is that very same patient who will default on her medication later.”

The Wits RHI team found that most antenatal nurses interviewed recognised that violence hurts adherence to ARV treatment but few know how to deal with the issue.

The poor health care response can partly be attributed to the lack of training but it may also reflect the fact that many nurses suffer violence at home and are afraid to respond.

Dr Nicola Christofides, an expert on both violence and HIV based at Wits University, explained that “nurses who experience violence in their own lives […] are either very sensitive to the issue of violence in their patients’ lives and very receptive, or the opposite, where they are actually in denial and shut down.”

Antenatal nurses want training to respond to violence, the WITS RHI project found.

IPS talked to Khoza at the antenatal clinic five months after she had first met a Wits RHI nurse of the Safe & Sound project, which identifies violence in pregnancy and provides one-on-one counseling and referrals in three antenatal clinics in Johannesburg.

The nurse referred Khoza to the nearest hospital offering psychological care and counseling. “It is nice to talk about the difficult things if you have someone who understands the situation and gives you clues,” Khoza said.

Khoza had never spoken about the violence in her life until the antenatal visits. A few months later, she separated from the abusive partner and is finding ways to support her children.

“I still have stress but I don’t put that in my heart. I just tell myself everything is going to work out all right even though it is difficult,” Khoza said.

* Name changed to protect her safety.

We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.

As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.

Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.

As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.

At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.

Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.

You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.