Florida’s controversial self-defense law, known as “Stand Your Ground,” has gained nationwide attention in recent years. This focus largely began after George Zimmerman fatally shot Trayvon Martin in 2012; though Martin was not armed, Zimmerman was ultimately acquitted, thanks to the Florida law.
Despite the negative press surrounding that trial and the law itself, Florida has not only retained Stand Your Ground, but it has also recently expanded it.
In July, an updated version of the law passed through the state legislature and was signed by Gov. Rick Scott. This revision changed the way individuals charged with homicide would be prosecuted when citing Stand Your Ground. The key difference here was that prosecutors would, before a jury trial was held, have to show that the defendant was not acting in self-defense.
In essence, this placed an unreasonable burden on the prosecution, effectively sidestepping of one of the most important aspects of the United States legal system: trial by jury.
It’s not all bad news, though.
Miami-Dade Circuit Judge Milton Hirsch ruled this week that the alterations to Stand Your Ground violated Florida’s constitution. In his order, Hirsch explained that legislators had exceeded their authority and argued that such changes could only come from the state’s Supreme Court.
Unfortunately, Hirsch’s decision only applies to Miami-Dade courts. The rest of Florida, at present, must carry on with the changes. On the bright side, however, this ruling will likely invite a showdown in Florida’s high court — one that legislators are not likely to win.
Though it might be a bit of a stretch to suggest it, such a legal skirmish could even find its way to the U.S. Supreme Court and affect Stand Your Ground laws across the country. While Brown v. United States — not to be confused with Brown v. Board of Education — addressed this issue at the highest level in 1921, state laws with various forms of Stand Your Ground or Castle Doctrine laws have become more nuanced than justices may have anticipated at the time.
And from a scientific standpoint, there’s a direct link between such self-defense laws and homicide rates.
A collaborative study between experts at the University of Oxford and the University of Pennsylvania examined firearm homicides in Florida between 2005 and 2014, and their findings are not entirely surprising.
Researchers discovered that the state, since strengthening Stand Your Ground, saw a 32 percent increase in homicide by firearm. In other words, if people know — or at least think — they face fewer repercussions for using guns lethally, they are more prone to do so.
With the hard facts at our disposal, it is now time for the high courts to intervene and eliminate these archaic, Wild West-inspired laws and the high body counts they bring with them.
We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.
As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.
Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.
As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.
At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.
Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.
You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.