In a dramatic display that stretched across two committee hearings on Tuesday, Rep. Jason Chaffetz (R-Utah) subpoenaed the head of the Drug Enforcement Administration for documents on its confidential sources program.
Members of Congress have been seeking copies of the DEA’s informant guidelines since last year, following an eye-opening report by the Department of Justice watchdog. The agency’s inspector general detailed how the agency doled out more than $200 million to confidential sources with very little oversight.
Lawmakers have only been allowed to view the policy documents in-camera, meaning without staff or any means to make copies for themselves. Chaffetz blasted the arrangement, calling it inadequate.
“Congress has a right to have this material,” Chaffetz said, during an Oversight Committee hearing that he chaired on Tuesday morning. “It is unbelievable to me that you think we shouldn’t have a copy of it.”
Robert Patterson, the current Deputy Administrator of the DEA, responded by claiming that the DOJ was blocking the release of copies of the guidelines to lawmakers.
Chaffetz told Patterson that he was going to walk next door to the House Judiciary Committee — where DEA Administrator Chuck Rosenberg was testifying on separate matters — to issue a subpoena for the documents.
A few hours later, Chaffetz followed through on his promise, after taking his seat on the judiciary subcommittee down the hall.
“We are issuing a subpoena, and so I see no choice,” he then told DEA chief Rosenberg.
“The Department of Justice just doesn’t get to hide things from the United States Congress,” Chaffetz added. He said that there’s evidence of “massive problems” with the DEA confidential informant program.
“I will look at the subpoena carefully and I will have a further discussion with you,” Rosenberg responded.
According to the DOJ Inspector General’s findings last September, the DEA paid $237 million to more than 18,000 informants over the last five years, but the agency has not detailed if the sources’ information is reliable.
The loose oversight “exposes the agency to an unacceptably increased potential for fraud, waste, and abuse, particularly given the frequency with which DEA offices utilize and pay confidential sources,” the IG concluded.
“It seems like we should be able to review this,” Chaffetz said Tuesday.
The House Oversight Committee chair had the backing of many colleagues, including the panel’s ranking member, Rep. Elijah Cummings (D-Md.).
“I wholeheartedly support the chairman,” Cummings said. “We’re just trying to do our job.”
We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.
As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.
Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.
As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.
At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.
Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.
You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.