Skip to content Skip to footer

Clinton Urges Diplomacy With Mubarak, New Government

Washington – Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton on Sunday issued a strong endorsement of key groups working to exert their influence on the chaotic Egyptian protests – the military, civil society groups and, perhaps most importantly, the nation’s people – while carefully avoiding any specific commitment to the embattled President

Washington – Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton on Sunday issued a strong endorsement of key groups working to exert their influence on the chaotic Egyptian protests – the military, civil society groups and, perhaps most importantly, the nation’s people – while carefully avoiding any specific commitment to the embattled President Hosni Mubarak.

She urged a national dialogue that would lead to free and fair elections this fall.

But while speaking in general terms of a transition on CNN’s “State of the Union,” she referred to Mr. Mubarak as someone remaining in power.

“What we’re trying to do is to help clear the air so that those who remain in power, starting with President Mubarak, with his new vice president, with the new prime minister, will begin a process of reaching out, of creating a dialogue that will bring in peaceful activists and representatives of civil society to, you know, plan a way forward that will meet the legitimate grievances of the Egyptian people,” she said.

Asked whether the United States was backing away from Mr. Mubarak and whether he could survive, the secretary carefully demurred. Mr. Mubarak’s political future, she said, “is going to be up to the Egyptian people.”

As she made the rounds of Sunday television talk shows, she urged the government in Cairo to respond in a “clear, unambiguous way” to the people’s demands and to do so “immediately” by quickly initiating a national dialogue. At the same time, she was supportive of the Egyptian military, calling it “a respected institution in Egyptian society, and we know they have delicate line to walk.”

Mrs. Clinton seemed to indicate that the Obama administration’s best hope was for a dialogue to channel the enormous energy on the streets, clearing the way for national elections already scheduled for September, presumably by reaching agreement on a fair and open framework and a corps of international observers.

“We have a calendar that already has elections for the next president scheduled,” she said. “There is an action-enforcing event that is already on the calendar.”

She did not address the question of whether events might short-circuit such a process.

Separately, Senator John McCain of Arizona, the ranking Republican on the Armed Services Committee, laid out a scenario that he said could lead to success: He said that if Mr. Mubarak would agree to not seek re-election; turn over his government to a caretaker; and allow a process to assure “a free, open, transparent election in September,” then, “I think you could do that, but this is a narrow window of opportunity. The longer unrest exists, the more likely it is to become extreme.”

Two former senior American diplomats, not bound by the discretion required of the secretary of state, predicted that Mr. Mubarak’s political demise was only a matter of time.

“I believe it,” Edward Walker, a former ambassador to Egypt, said on CNN about Mr. Mubarak’s eventual departure. Referring to the protesters on Egyptian streets, he added, “He’s become a symbol for everything that they find objectionable.”

John Negroponte, the former ambassador to the United Nations, said he agreed that Mr. Mubarak’s days in office were numbered.

Mr. Walker said he did not expect a rise to power of the Muslim Brotherhood, and he said that to suggest a parallel to the Iranian revolution of 1979 was “a way overreach.”

Mr. Negroponte seemed a bit less sanguine. “We have a lot of examples of disasters that have followed after the demise of an authoritarian leader,” he said on CNN. “If this goes wrong it could be very bad for our interests.”

He added: “ I don’t think we should be in that big of a hurry for the regime to change.”

This article “Clinton Urges Diplomacy With Mubarak, New Government” originally appeared at The New York Times.

© 2010 The New York Times Company

Truthout has licensed this content. It may not be reproduced by any other source and is not covered by our Creative Commons license.

We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.

As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.

Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.

As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.

At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.

Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.

You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.