Skip to content Skip to footer

Consumer Financial Protection Bureau’s Payday Loan Rule Survives GOP Repeal — for Now

While Congress appeared to officially spare the payday rule, hours earlier, there was an ominous development in Washington for consumer safeguards.

There was rare good news for regulatory safeguards this week: The window closed for Congress to pass legislation repealing the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau rule on payday loans, according to advocates of the initiative.

Stop the Debt Trap, a coalition of labor unions and non-profits, said Wednesday evening that the “legislative clock has expired” on efforts to annul the rule under the Congressional Review Act.

“Consumer and civil rights advocates are urging the consumer bureau to keep intact the rule, which is set to go into effect summer 2019, and to fulfill the bureau’s responsibility to enforce the law,” the organization said in a statement.

The rule is centered around the idea short-term, high-interest lenders must try to ensure that borrowers can afford to make payment on their products. It was finalized last October by then-CFPB Director Richard Cordray, an Obama-appointee. Federal law prevents the CFPB from imposing any kind of cap on interest rates.

Since Trump was inaugurated, Republicans have used the Congressional Review Act fifteen times to successfully repeal rules passed by the Obama administration or its appointees. That includes one law enacted to take down a CFPB rule outlawing contracts that bar cheated consumers from seeking damages in class action lawsuits.

Only four Senators have cosponsored the CRA bill on the bureau’s payday rule — Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.), Pat Toomey (R-Pa.), Joni Ernst (R-Iowa), and Ted Cruz (R-Texas).

The Senate and the House have also recently passed legislation nullifying a five-year old CFPB guidance to indirect auto-lenders — on how to comply with laws against racial discrimination in lending.

Though the time limit to bring repeals under the CRA is 60 legislative days, the Government Accountability Office said in December that the guidance qualified as a rule for repeal under the law.

While Congress appeared on Wednesday to officially spare the payday rule, hours earlier, there was an ominous development in Washington for consumer safeguards. In a party-line vote, the Federal Trade Commission voted 3-2 to approve Andrew Smith as head of the agency’s Bureau of Consumer Protection.

Smith has previously served as a lawyer for some of the most recognizable corporations accused of malfeasance, as noted Monday by Sens. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.), Richard Blumenthal (D-Conn.), and Brian Schatz (D-Hawaii).

“Mr. Smith is well known in Washington for his representation of Equifax, Facebook, Uber, and other companies that have been accused of some of the worst abuses of consumers–a record that leaves him unfit and unable to function as the FTC’s top consumer advocate,” the lawmakers said.

Smith has also served as a lawyer for payday lender AMG services. As The New York Times noted on Wednesday, the company found itself in legal trouble due to “predatory practices against impoverished borrowers.” Those practices led to $1.3 billion in fines from the FTC itself.

We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.

As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.

Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.

As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.

At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.

Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.

You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.