Despite a firm veto threat from Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger, the California Senate on Thursday passed a measure along party lines to create a $200 billion state-run, single-payer health care system. The bill—SB 810—now heads to the state Assembly for consideration.
The legislation calls for the creation of the California Health System, which would be financed by using a combination of state and federal funds that California already earmarks for health care along with a payroll tax, the amount of which would be decided later.
The Medicare-for-all system would be extended to all California residents and individuals would have the opportunity to purchase private insurance to cover specific types of services not included in the government-run plan.
The bill, sponsored by Sen. Mark Leno (D-San Francisco), closely mirrors what Rep. Dennis Kucinich (D-Ohio) had envisioned when he introduced an amendment last summer that would have allowed individual states to create a single-payer system.
Kucinich’s amendment, however, was quietly stripped from the House version of a health care bill on orders from the White House after the legislation was unveiled last winter.
President Barack Obama and Democrats have seen support for their health care initiatives wane among their most ardent supporters as lawmakers increasingly capitulated to Republicans and conservative Democrats over proposals in early versions of a national health care bill.
Measures that originally called for a government-run heatlh care plan to compete with private insurers, otherwise known as a public option, and extending Medicare benefits to individuals beginning at age 55 are no longer part of the bill currently under consideration by lawmakers in the House and Senate.
In a statement after the legislation cleared the 40-member state Senate, Leno said the “real impetus” behind his proposal “is a growing grassroots movement representing millions of Californians who want a health care system that takes care of their families and is affordable for themselves and employers.”
“Solving health care isn’t about leftwing or rightwing politics – it’s about the future of the middle class,” Leno said. “Our state is being bankrupted by out of control health care costs, and a single-payer universal health care system has been proven to save billions of dollars a year for businesses, families and government.”
Leno said California currently wastes 30 percent of every dollar spent on health care to cover administrative costs, which would be eliminated under his plan. He added that the state already spends $200 billion a year on health care and the single-payer system he proposes would simply use the same funds in a different manner.
Still, many of the details have not yet been worked out, prompting Senate President Pro Tem Darrell Steinberg (D-Sacramento) to remark that “single-payer is a long way off.”
A “long way off” is putting it midly. If the bill is approved in the state Assembly, Schwarzenegger has said he would veto it when it hits his desk. The governor has previously vetoed two similar proposals.
Schwarzenegger’s spokeswoman, Rachel Arrezola, claims budget cuts and the state’s $20 billion deficit are the primary reasons the governor intends to veto the bill.
“Any elected official who thinks it’s a good idea to strap the state with tens of billions of dollars from a government-run health care system is clearly not in touch with what voters need and deserve,” Arrezola said.
But Leno noted that the plan “creates no new spending, and in fact, studies show that the state would save $8 billion in the first year under this single-payer health care plan.”
We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.
As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.
Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.
As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.
At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.
Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.
You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.