On August 9, the California Assembly took the historic step of becoming the first state to agree to publicize the text of three ratified UN human rights treaties, and to submit the required reports to the State Department for consideration by the UN treaty committees. The State Assembly voted to pass ACR129, the Human Rights Reporting legislation, by a vote of 52 to 11, with 16 abstentions. The legislation will now move to the state Senate.
The International Convention on Elimination of all forms of Racial Discrimination requires the United States to publicize the text at the federal, state and local levels and to make periodic reports to the UN Committee on Elimination of Racial Discrimination every two years on complaints of racial discrimination in every aspect of life and on progress in eliminating such discrimination.
The US ratified this treaty in 1994 and has issued some of the required reports, but has never publicized the text nor has it sought, or included, information from each state, as required. Now the California Assembly has voted to publicize and make the required reports.
The International Convention against Torture and other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading or Treatment was ratified by the United States in 1994. It requires reporting every four years on misconduct and improper conduct by police, prison guards, human services agents and everyone in government and what steps the government is taking to correct reported problems.
The International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights requires reports to the UN Human Rights Committee every five years on violations and enforcement of freedom of assembly, labor union rights, rights of children, immigrants and LGBT. When the Senate passes this Assembly Concurrent Resolution 129, California agencies will collect the information they already gather and submit it to the State Department for submission to the UN Human Rights Committee.
Our readers are our only financial backers – keep Truthout afloat by supporting us today.
Bill Monning, the representative for the 27th Assembly District, sponsored ACR129.
The City of Berkeley in September 2009 voted to become the first US city to make reports under these treaties. City officials now state that collecting the information for the reports has heightened concern about human rights at City Hall.
Rev. Daniel Buford, president of the Meiklejohn Civil Liberties Institute (MCLI) and prophetic justice minister at Allen Temple Baptist Church in Oakland, testified before the Assembly Appropriations Committee before adoption of the Resolution. He reported that he found the three treaties very helpful in working on justice in the killing of Oscar Grant by BART police officer Johannes Mehserle last year.
Attorney Ann Fagan Ginger, founder of MCLI, reports enthusiastic response when she describes the treaties to African-American; Asian-American; Latino and human rights organizations; students; unions; people working on health care, prison conditions, the homeless, immigrant rights, ecology issues; and all other human rights related issues.
When the United States ratifies a treaty, it becomes part of US law under the Supremacy Clause of the Constitution. The United States has not fully complied with its obligations under our ratified human rights treaties. While our government does not hesitate to criticize other countries for their human rights violations, it has been derelict in complying with our own human rights commitments. Hopefully, the California Senate will also pass this important legislation, which would send a strong message to other states and the federal government that this country is serious about protecting human rights.
We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.
As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.
Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.
As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.
At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.
Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.
You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.