Skip to content Skip to footer

Biden WH Considers Making Temporary Asylum Rule Changes More Permanent

“This is a shameful moment,” one immigrant rights group said of the potential changes to the asylum rule.

A migrant family seeking asylum is escorted to a patrol vehicle while being apprehended by U.S. Customs and Border protection officers after crossing over into the U.S. on June 25, 2024, in Ruby, Arizona.

The Biden administration is reportedly considering making temporary changes to asylum rules issued earlier this summer harder to undo by increasing threshold numbers needed to end the rules to likely unattainable levels — effectively causing them to be permanent.

President Joe Biden signed an executive order in June changing how migrants coming to the U.S. could apply for asylum. Previously, a person could request asylum protections whether they crossed at a legal port of entry or entered the country in a different way, a policy consistent with international laws. But Biden’s order changed that, allowing officials at the border to turn people back if they didn’t enter at a port of entry and make the request there.

The order stipulated that the new rule could only be ended when crossings went down to 1,500 daily on average over a seven-day period. Although crossings have gone down significantly since the policy was implemented, that daily threshold hasn’t yet been met.

Even so, the administration is considering making it even harder to meet that daily average, by raising the number of days needed from a seven-day average to a 28-day average, according to a Department of Homeland Security (DHS) official who spoke anonymously to CBS News about the matter.

The changes being considered by the Biden administration would also require individuals previously exempted from being counted under the rule to abide by it. Under the June executive order, for example, unaccompanied migrant children were not included in the count of daily migrants seeking asylum. Under the new changes being considered, however, they would be.

Lee Gelernt, an immigrant rights lawyer with the ACLU who is preparing a lawsuit against the original executive order, told CBS News that the proposed changes would be unlawful.

“The rule is patently illegal and was supposed to be temporary but these contemplated changes would further cement the illegality,” Gelernt said.

Other immigrant rights advocates and organizations similarly panned the proposal on social media.

“They absolutely should NOT do this,” said Tim Young, director of public relations at Global Refuge, calling the proposed plan by the Biden administration “outrageous.”

“We are the world’s humanitarian leader, and yet our leaders keep coming up with creative ways to move the goalposts on some of the most vulnerable migrants seeking safety,” Young added, voicing his disdain on X.

“There is no doubt that we need to rethink the current asylum system, which would include giving it an infusion of resources so that people don’t have to wait 5 years for a decision,” Aaron Reichlin-Melnick, senior fellow at American Immigration Council, also said on X. “But cutting it off to whole swathes of people for reasons unrelated to their claims isn’t a fix.”

“This is a shameful moment,” wrote the account for Immigrant Defenders Law Center. “U.S. immigration policy should not slam the door in the face of those seeking safety. We must show up with moral integrity to modernize broken systems — instead of solidifying policies that will force family separations for generations to come.”

“The asylum shutdown rule is already illegal. It is already endangering the lives of refugees seeking safety,” The Center for Gender and Refugee Studies wrote. “These changes would make it even more impossible for people to exercise their rights, putting vulnerable families, kids, and adults directly in harm’s way.”

Truthout Is Preparing to Meet Trump’s Agenda With Resistance at Every Turn

Dear Truthout Community,

If you feel rage, despondency, confusion and deep fear today, you are not alone. We’re feeling it too. We are heartsick. Facing down Trump’s fascist agenda, we are desperately worried about the most vulnerable people among us, including our loved ones and everyone in the Truthout community, and our minds are racing a million miles a minute to try to map out all that needs to be done.

We must give ourselves space to grieve and feel our fear, feel our rage, and keep in the forefront of our mind the stark truth that millions of real human lives are on the line. And simultaneously, we’ve got to get to work, take stock of our resources, and prepare to throw ourselves full force into the movement.

Journalism is a linchpin of that movement. Even as we are reeling, we’re summoning up all the energy we can to face down what’s coming, because we know that one of the sharpest weapons against fascism is publishing the truth.

There are many terrifying planks to the Trump agenda, and we plan to devote ourselves to reporting thoroughly on each one and, crucially, covering the movements resisting them. We also recognize that Trump is a dire threat to journalism itself, and that we must take this seriously from the outset.

Last week, the four of us sat down to have some hard but necessary conversations about Truthout under a Trump presidency. How would we defend our publication from an avalanche of far right lawsuits that seek to bankrupt us? How would we keep our reporters safe if they need to cover outbreaks of political violence, or if they are targeted by authorities? How will we urgently produce the practical analysis, tools and movement coverage that you need right now — breaking through our normal routines to meet a terrifying moment in ways that best serve you?

It will be a tough, scary four years to produce social justice-driven journalism. We need to deliver news, strategy, liberatory ideas, tools and movement-sparking solutions with a force that we never have had to before. And at the same time, we desperately need to protect our ability to do so.

We know this is such a painful moment and donations may understandably be the last thing on your mind. But we must ask for your support, which is needed in a new and urgent way.

We promise we will kick into an even higher gear to give you truthful news that cuts against the disinformation and vitriol and hate and violence. We promise to publish analyses that will serve the needs of the movements we all rely on to survive the next four years, and even build for the future. We promise to be responsive, to recognize you as members of our community with a vital stake and voice in this work.

Please dig deep if you can, but a donation of any amount will be a truly meaningful and tangible action in this cataclysmic historical moment. We are presently looking for 430 new monthly donors in the next 7 days.

We’re with you. Let’s do all we can to move forward together.

With love, rage, and solidarity,

Maya, Negin, Saima, and Ziggy