Skip to content Skip to footer

Biden Calls GOP’s Inability to Select Speaker of the House “Embarrassing”

The selection of a speaker is “not my problem,” Biden said, adding that the “world is watching” to see what happens.

President Joe Biden returns to the White House on January 2, 2023, in Washington, D.C.

On Wednesday, President Joe Biden spoke to reporters about Republicans’ failure to select a speaker of the House of Representatives, the congressional chamber in which they hold a majority.

Six votes have been held so far — three on each of the two days that the House has convened since the start of the 118th Congress. Each of those six votes failed to produce a winner for the speakership. House GOP leader Rep. Kevin McCarthy (California), who was viewed as the frontrunner for the position, needs to reach 218 votes in the chamber, but due to the party’s very slim majority in the House, can only afford to lose four Republican votes. A far right coalition of around 20 Republicans has voted against him in each vote so far.

After its sixth vote yesterday afternoon, the House voted to adjourn until 8 pm Eastern Time. At that hour, the House voted to adjourn again until Thursday at noon, though the situation hadn’t changed.

This is the first time since 1923 that a vote for speaker of the House went beyond the first ballot. Biden weighed in on the legislative branch’s dilemma on his way to an event in Kentucky to promote the infrastructure package.

“With regards to the fight over the speaker … that’s not my problem,” he said to reporters. “I just think it’s a little embarrassing that it’s taking so long.”

Still, Biden noted that the “rest of the world is looking” at the situation to see if House Republicans can “get [their] act together.”

Earlier this week, White House Press Secretary Karine Jean-Pierre told reporters that Biden would “not insert himself in that process,” referring to votes on the speakership.

Notably, Biden can’t do much with the House whether or not there is a speaker to run it — as long as Republicans are in charge, it’s unlikely the chamber will pass bills that would advance his agenda. Instead, Biden will likely focus on the Senate and the nomination of federal judges moving forward.

It will be easier for Senate Democrats to approve judges for Biden this term, as they gained an additional seat in last year’s midterm races. Even if Sen. Kyrsten Sinema, who switched her party affiliation from Democrat to independent last month, chooses not to caucus with Democrats, the party would still have a 50-49 advantage over Republicans, relieving them of the need to broker a power-sharing arrangement, as they had in previous years.

Senate Democratic leaders have already expressed their readiness to approve more judges for Biden. Sen. Dick Durbin (D-Illinois), who chairs the Senate Judiciary Committee, said last month that Democrats will “hit the ground running” when it comes to confirming judicial nominees. Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-New York) has echoed those sentiments, stating that “judges will remain a top priority in the Congress to come.”

We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.

As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.

Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.

As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.

At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.

Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.

You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.