After MSNBC suspended Keith Olbermann from “Countdown” for making contributions to political campaigns, activists and pundits on both sides of the aisle used the occasion to speak out on journalistic integrity and freedom of the press.
On November 5, Politico reported that Olbermann had given $2,400 to Arizona Reps. Gabrielle Giffors and Raul Grijalva and Kentucky Senate candidate Jack Conway; later that day, MSNBC President Phil Griffins announced that he would be suspending Olbermann indefinitely to be “mindful of NBC News policy and standards.”
And while MSNBC Griffin announced Olbermann’s reinstatement to the air on Monday, Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vermont) has placed the controversy in a different perspective, stating his opposition to a merger between Comcast Corp. and NBC Universal, which owns MSNBC.
“I want to take this opportunity to congratulate the hundreds of thousand of progressives and others who demanded that Keith Olbermann be reinstated to his position at MSNBC,” Sanders stated. “These people understand the enormously important role that the media play in contemporary American politics.”
The union would grant Comcast majority ownership over NBC Universal, replacing its current parent company, General Electric (GE). Critics of the deal include media watchdog and reform organizations such as Free Press and Media Access Project, as well as Sen. Al Franken. Media Matters for America and the Progressive Change Campaign Committee could not be reached for comment.
Sanders emphasized that Comcast is the biggest cable provider in the country. If the merger goes through, “the new head of that company would be Stephen B. Burke, Comcast’s chief operating officer and a ‘Bush Ranger’ who raised at least $200,000 for the 2004 reelection campaign of President George W. Bush,” Sanders stated. Sanders also criticized GE, stating that the company has “an anti-labor history of outsourcing jobs and with financial links to military and nuclear power industries.”
Click here to sign up for Truthout’s FREE daily email updates.
“Surely we understand that GE is not going to provide the same backing for MSNBC commentators that Rupert Murdoch provides for his mouthpieces at Fox News,” Sanders said, referencing arguments made by Media Matters for America and MSNBC anchor Rachel Maddow that Olbermann’s suspension by MSNBC demonstrates a journalistic integrity lacking at Fox News.
Comcast has denied that it had any influence in the decision, stating, “Comcast is committed to the independence of NBC’s news operations.”
Yet, advocacy blog Think Progress points out that Comcast CEO Brian Roberts implied otherwise in a New York Times article published in May 2010. Media executive Peter Chernin, who chaired News Corp. before Rupert Murdoch, asked Roberts how he would oversee the daily editorial operations of a large news group.
“‘Are you saying that you’ll never interfere?’ he asked. Mr. Roberts blanched slightly at the question, which included a hypothetical situation that had Keith Olbermann, an MSNBC host, attacking a couple of Republican congressmen just as the approvals were being finished. ‘Let’s have that conversation in six months or 12 months,’ Mr. Roberts said.”
Media Matters for America also noted that other MSNBC anchors, including “Morning Joe” co-host Joe Scarborough and CNBC’s Larry Kudlow, were found to have contributed to Republican candidates for Congress and did not face repercussion.
“We do not need another media giant run by a Republican supporter of George W. Bush,” Sanders said. “That is the lesson we should learn from the Keith Olbermann suspension.”
We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.
As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.
Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.
As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.
At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.
Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.
You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.